I just debunked that in 3 min

^^^^^^

Like I said radiometric dating

Analyzing the amount of carbon12 and carbon14

The older the sample the less of it there will be

@dabber

If something's dead it obviously can't exchange carbon with the environment so the amount of carbon it contains decays

hi

howdy

My tits are flat

well if youre male yes

unless you have big ol man boobs

!mute @Shawirma

What "scientific evidence"

Carbon dating is largely inaccurate.

because youve nothing to offer but sillyness 😄

I am not a mod, a mod muted people to make it so not every1 tlaks at once

shush for a minute

its more like on the bottom of a sea bed, with sun an moon revolving above

science proved we're stationary

hol on, others are talking

carbon dating has already been debunked so many times. check the video citizen z posted very good stuff

The video literally debunked it because of the bible

that is never valid evidence

@chrisb0302 no the video shows proof that it doesn't work, rocks that were formed 60 years suddenly date back to millions of year ago. this happens so many times

flat flat flat

Rocks take millions of years to form, not 60

@Velvet Remix here

Where's your evidence besides some guy saying those rocks formed 60 years ago

There's been countless tests of radiometric dating based on how much carbon is left

@chrisb0302 it's not some guy saying it was dated 60 years ago, we know it happened because there was a volcanic eruption