What "scientific evidence"

Carbon dating is largely inaccurate.

because youve nothing to offer but sillyness 😄

I am not a mod, a mod muted people to make it so not every1 tlaks at once

shush for a minute

its more like on the bottom of a sea bed, with sun an moon revolving above

science proved we're stationary

hol on, others are talking

carbon dating has already been debunked so many times. check the video citizen z posted very good stuff

The video literally debunked it because of the bible

that is never valid evidence

@chrisb0302 no the video shows proof that it doesn't work, rocks that were formed 60 years suddenly date back to millions of year ago. this happens so many times

flat flat flat

Rocks take millions of years to form, not 60

@Velvet Remix here

Where's your evidence besides some guy saying those rocks formed 60 years ago

There's been countless tests of radiometric dating based on how much carbon is left

@chrisb0302 it's not some guy saying it was dated 60 years ago, we know it happened because there was a volcanic eruption

@Logrian I don't think you're grasping how absolutely massive the earth is

yes it was a volcanic eruption

but how does some guy know it was 60 years ago

which formed the rocks 60 years ago but they still show to be million of years ago

that is literally not how rocks work

carbon dating is an extremely long process, if it were 60 years old it would contain the exact amount of carbon as a rock 5 minutes old

ok bitch boy then why didn't it show that it was 5 minutes old?

Rude