Message from @Drewski4343
Discord ID: 680637476544839703
Plenty do.
But, most of them are asleep right now.
I'd disagree with that. It's not one or the other. I'm not a flat earther, but I can understand a flat earther finding it hard to believe that satellites adjust for time dilation because there is *basically* no way to confirm this for ourselves other than trusting an authority. You can compare this to something like, "I used a telescope to check my claim, here's a picture I took". There is a difference.
basically no way to confirm, given my resources yes
Well, it doesn't really change much though if it is true or not.
You know some people don’t believe in gravity
Yes.
Check above.
most flat earthers do not believe in gravity.
What’s keeping us from floating up into the stratosphere
I'm not sure I'd say most, but the most public ones, I'd agree.
They argue it is density.
Most flat earthers don't believe in Newton's laws if you push them hard enough
Density of what
Relative density / buoyancy.
Ask the Flat Earthers, not me.
they think propulsion in space is impossible lol
of the object in the medium.
(some do)
Well, you know what the more scientific term for Relative Density is, right?
Also, of note, Buoyancy and Relative Density are two entirely different things.
Yep.
Relative Density doesn't even have units
Because it is a ratio
On its own, it isn't a force or anything.
And on its own it does nothing to hold down matter.
Buoyancy, is a bit more rational, but of course there are reasons why that flounders too.
But that's my two cents.
The bouyant force is scaled by the relativity density tho
It is.
relative
Because it is a ratio
You need to multiply it by something for it to be of any use
no relative wouldn't be a ration it'd be a difference I think
since at equal density bouyant force is zero
Relative Density is a ratio.
but that would be a ratio of 1
Relative Density is p[1] / p[2]
Usually p[1] / p[H20]