Message from @Pit Droid
Discord ID: 683294786374992021
well as far as I am concerned your all wrong as you haven't offered any real counter evidence to this.
only literal appeals to authority
So your link states: "we neglect the refraction of light in the atmosphere, which may increase this value" btw
bye bye glob
Given refraction depends on the temperature gradient, being over ice does not negate refraction. In fact refraction can be extreme in arctic regions where the atmosphere can be much much warmer than the ocean or ice
youre not allowed refraction in a glob model
Because?
The earth is round u goy fogs
I'm not sure what your point is?
I joined this to say this ur all dumb asf the earth is round
Idiots
Stupid
Ur bad
Ahhahaha
Earth is round
There's a geometric horizon because the earth is round, and also there is refraction, therefore the actual location is distorted/you get weird optical effects
So u think the earth is round too
there are no weird effects, just the horizon being at a distance impossible for a ball
Thats a wide angle lense distortion* fyi
I mean, the horizon is obervably different to the vanishing point, so no actually only impossible if the earth is flat.
i already calculated it for you derp
stop being a dumdum
Says the person ignoring refraction 🤔
says the person ignoring facts
sigh
at 6 inches the MAXIMUM horizon is 0.9 miles but we OBSERVE the horizon beyong 8miles
theres NO refraction to account for this, also if you say refraction youre a flat earther 😉
With high refraction you can see 10 miles at 6 inches. If you use the globe earth curve calculator.
nope
What I meant is that, because of the negative zoom on a wide angle lense, you can get flat planes just about anywhere. Thats why I said that that photograph was a wide angle lense distortion.
Dont believe me, research it 😉
Shhhh, dont cry
watch it
you may learn sumink