Message from @Data Pagan
Discord ID: 526587332422402083
I'd rather have 10 t34 than one or two panthers
*someone is compensating for something*
Any T-34 is bad
It works for USSR armor wave @Tea , but as an individual, it's a bad tank
It is, but it did was it was designed for crudely.
They were designed to be replaced as quickly as they were destroyed
do small dicked people really compensate with big items or is it just a meme?
@MrCuttlefish worst individually.
But that's what I am talking about.
doctrine is a different beast
insects that produce more offspring survive pretty well as species'
They had an expected life of 3 months. 12 hours in combat.
T-34 was only good due to the sheer volume of tanks produced
73% T-34s were lost if I remember right?
Russian doctrine at the time was sound to a degree. For what they were achieving. After the war they struggled to do anything.
100% were made like shit
Yep cuttle.
84% of KV tanks
?
They just had thick armor and could be built cheaply
Reliability was a massive factor. Hence the Sherman was a stellar machine for what it was needed for
The T-34 didnt have a pin to hold the track in place, so it has a slopped bit of armor on the sides to knock the holders back into place
Probe to spalling and cracking easily with ap rounds
More so than the German or other allied tanks.
Prone*
Didn’t the oil and air filters need to be changed on a weekly basis?
@Data Pagan every few days.
Air filters were gash.
Did it even HAVE air filters?
so often that most the time the tank was fucked before you replaced it
yeah the maintaince list for a T-34 was fucking awful
You had so much shit to do
I GOT ME HAIR DONE
I’m not a naziphile but the Panzer III/IV were rock solid tanks
Not gonna give the Tiger any credit since it was too expensive and got stuck pretty easily
Im a naziphile
A little