Message from @Maximus
Discord ID: 526586861053804564
T-34 is a garbage tank
Or the second tank (centurion i think)
T-34-85 is a good tank
T-34-76 is bad
^
All T-34 models are horrible af
t34-85
Tell that to the germans
^
Something is wrong when you're main strength of the tank is being able to out produce as a winning idea. That says more about Soviet production than the tank
It fulfilled their doctrine though.
Even though there was missing we welds so big you could put your fist in it.
I'd rather have 10 t34 than one or two panthers
*someone is compensating for something*
Any T-34 is bad
It works for USSR armor wave @Tea , but as an individual, it's a bad tank
It is, but it did was it was designed for crudely.
They were designed to be replaced as quickly as they were destroyed
@MrCuttlefish worst individually.
But that's what I am talking about.
doctrine is a different beast
insects that produce more offspring survive pretty well as species'
They had an expected life of 3 months. 12 hours in combat.
T-34 was only good due to the sheer volume of tanks produced
73% T-34s were lost if I remember right?
Russian doctrine at the time was sound to a degree. For what they were achieving. After the war they struggled to do anything.
100% were made like shit
Yep cuttle.
84% of KV tanks
?
Almost all of those Russian tanks were trash
They just had thick armor and could be built cheaply
Reliability was a massive factor. Hence the Sherman was a stellar machine for what it was needed for
The T-34 didnt have a pin to hold the track in place, so it has a slopped bit of armor on the sides to knock the holders back into place
Probe to spalling and cracking easily with ap rounds
More so than the German or other allied tanks.