Message from @Lloyd

Discord ID: 526907973226987520


2018-12-24 23:40:31 UTC  

Ye khabli khan is weird

2018-12-24 23:40:35 UTC  

20 minutes to christmas

2018-12-24 23:40:36 UTC  

Well I mean after 15 years their power output has still decreased by half

2018-12-24 23:40:41 UTC  

RTG is what matt Damon sat with in the Martin innit?

2018-12-24 23:40:45 UTC  

ye

2018-12-24 23:41:05 UTC  

@Data Pagan well no...

2018-12-24 23:41:12 UTC  

theoretically yes

2018-12-24 23:41:37 UTC  

the helf-life thing is weird like

2018-12-24 23:41:40 UTC  

I thought half lives were a pretty hard time limit on the usage of an RTG?

2018-12-24 23:41:44 UTC  

Would it be best to make a probe to a neighboring star nuclear powered with retractable panals for use here and reuse there?

2018-12-24 23:41:54 UTC  

​Goodbye.

2018-12-24 23:41:54 UTC  

Like from the instant it’s built, it’s already slowly losing power

2018-12-24 23:42:54 UTC  

I mean yeah it’s all random chance on when a single atom will chose to decay

2018-12-24 23:42:58 UTC  

as far as i can tell it should.

2018-12-24 23:43:15 UTC  

@lolfire If you were female probably

2018-12-24 23:43:25 UTC  

I don't have space for manlove

2018-12-24 23:43:34 UTC  

But you can take that average decay rate per gram of material and extrapolate that out over several days or years and have a solid approximation on its life span

2018-12-24 23:43:47 UTC  

You're assuming people would touch you

2018-12-24 23:44:07 UTC  

Half life talk in here.

2018-12-24 23:44:08 UTC  

Rip my stomach

2018-12-24 23:44:10 UTC  

All this talk about radiation is pretty interesting and has motivated me to study for the first time in my life, thank you

2018-12-24 23:44:35 UTC  

@Data Pagan Most RTGs use 238Pu, which decays with a half-life of 87.7 years. RTGs using this material will therefore diminish in power output by a factor of 1−0.51/87.74, or 0.787%, per year.

2018-12-24 23:44:37 UTC  

Feeling insecure about it ?

2018-12-24 23:45:08 UTC  

What

2018-12-24 23:45:14 UTC  

What the fuck did I just see

2018-12-24 23:45:22 UTC  

Lolfire gets used for his arsehole, nothing more

2018-12-24 23:45:23 UTC  

But wouldn’t that mean at roughly 42-46 years, the output would be halved?

2018-12-24 23:45:31 UTC  

haha!

2018-12-24 23:45:32 UTC  

The more I read the chat the more my IQ grows

2018-12-24 23:45:33 UTC  

nah

2018-12-24 23:45:33 UTC  

<:bb:449145356123504660>

2018-12-24 23:45:34 UTC  

Good that you admit it

2018-12-24 23:45:36 UTC  

Or am I wrong

2018-12-24 23:45:44 UTC  

@lolfire this nigga out here fucking people at bus stops

2018-12-24 23:45:48 UTC  

Is the thermal output constant that entire time?

2018-12-24 23:45:52 UTC  

@Data Pagan One example is the RTG used by the Voyager probes. In the year 2000, 23 years after production, the radioactive material inside the RTG had decreased in power by 16.6%, i.e. providing 83.4% of its initial output; starting with a capacity of 470 W, after this length of time it would have a capacity of only 392 W. A related loss of power in the Voyager RTGs is the degrading properties of the bi-metallic thermocouples used to convert thermal energy into electrical energy; the RTGs were working at about 67% of their total original capacity instead of the expected 83.4%. By the beginning of 2001, the power generated by the Voyager RTGs had dropped to 315 W for Voyager 1 and to 319 W for Voyager 2.

2018-12-24 23:46:19 UTC  

Well then fuck me I guess

2018-12-24 23:46:27 UTC  

Well shit

2018-12-24 23:46:38 UTC  

I’ve got no idea what dis is about

2018-12-24 23:46:38 UTC  

Soviets used them in light houses placed in the artic circle

2018-12-24 23:46:44 UTC  

But it’s interesting