Because they didn’t lose a war.

They had a populous that were angry at the government for the loss of their sons

Also, they’re much more loyal to the monarchy.

Monty

you're pro-violence

Yes

you literally would have no backing

after a disastrous war

Everyone is pro violence

Some people just like to hide it under a layer of diffusion

Are you fucking dumb? The brown shirts were pro violence but made the people feel a sense of order

How would the black shirts be any different

The government of England was still strong and stable, and so was the monarchy.

No it wasnt. There was constant arguing between both parties, to the point where partisans were having brawls in the street

How is that any different from normal?

Partisans dont have brawls in the street anymore

***meanwhile in antifa***

Antifa are a non issue. A group of cringe LARPers throwing tantrums. Any organised force can deal with them in minutes

See if chinas police went up against antifa

Antifa is based and epic

That would be hilarious

Antifa are cringe

US antifa is mostly cringe

@Monty
>See if China’s Police went up against Antifa

>Meanwhile in Hong Kong

Chinese people are ants

It would be hilarious

All asians are stupid fucking insectoids

See them get blasted with water cannons and

Bean bags

Funny as fuck

They’ll just counter with bike locks and molotovs.

Bike locks and molotovs used by skinny little soy bois

I do like the simultaneous

"Antifa is violent and a threat to freedom!"

https://youtu.be/jWjPmareY

mixed with

"Antifa is full of soy boys"

Fire burns shit regardless of who lights it.

I'm not saying that tho am i

>Not beating up police officers