Message from @DrRisen

Discord ID: 658794754468872247


2019-12-23 22:09:03 UTC  

a mongotard moment

2019-12-23 22:09:11 UTC  

mongoloid and retard

2019-12-23 22:09:22 UTC  

Weapons-grade autism

2019-12-23 22:09:53 UTC  

"lol mosley and his unarmed gang of a few thousand would be able to take control of the government <:brainlet:523325379545399316> "

2019-12-23 22:10:07 UTC  

"and no1 would resist <:brainlet:554345292603064330>"

2019-12-23 22:11:00 UTC  
2019-12-23 22:11:01 UTC  

Again, I would arm his supporters and plan ahead. Plus I said that I wouldn't bother to win public opinion, but his station would help the coup

2019-12-23 22:11:40 UTC  

Public opinion is required in a coup. The military would just splat you like a fly in any other case.

2019-12-23 22:12:15 UTC  

That or you’d die in the dozens of resulting assassination attempts.

2019-12-23 22:12:28 UTC  

Or a countercoup.

2019-12-23 22:12:51 UTC  

@Monty ok 69 IQ

2019-12-23 22:12:54 UTC  

Assassination attempts are hardly effective. Didnt tito survive tons of them?

2019-12-23 22:13:05 UTC  

They were soviet assassins

2019-12-23 22:13:10 UTC  

Lmao

2019-12-23 22:13:24 UTC  

Tito had control of the military. You gave a few thousand “militia” members.

2019-12-23 22:13:34 UTC  

Sorry got to meet censorship requirements for mossad

2019-12-23 22:13:49 UTC  

It would be the Beer Hall Putsch Part 2: Electric Boogaloo,

2019-12-23 22:14:38 UTC  

The beer hall putsch ended up in swaying public opinion in favour of the nazis, so I dont see how that supports you point

2019-12-23 22:14:47 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/658794661263179776/image0.png

2019-12-23 22:15:04 UTC  

<:xd:433062903222894593>

2019-12-23 22:15:09 UTC  

And no, it didn’t. Mein Kampf did.

2019-12-23 22:15:27 UTC  

And England is a very different environment than post-war Germany.

2019-12-23 22:15:39 UTC  

Putsch wouldve been successful if Hitler didnt have Prussians in his cabinet and better communications

2019-12-23 22:15:46 UTC  

A rambling book blaming economic woes and communism on Jews wouldn’t be too successful.

2019-12-23 22:16:53 UTC  

How? Post war england was wracked by economic downturn and agitated populace seems pretty similar. The only difference is that England didnt have proportional representation

2019-12-23 22:17:41 UTC  

They were also in massive debt to america, and got hit hard by the wall street crash

2019-12-23 22:18:16 UTC  

Because they didn’t have a populous that blamed the government and more importantly the loss of a war.

2019-12-23 22:18:35 UTC  

Because they didn’t lose a war.

2019-12-23 22:18:57 UTC  

They had a populous that were angry at the government for the loss of their sons

2019-12-23 22:19:02 UTC  

Also, they’re much more loyal to the monarchy.

2019-12-23 22:19:31 UTC  

Monty

2019-12-23 22:19:37 UTC  

you're pro-violence

2019-12-23 22:19:42 UTC  

Yes

2019-12-23 22:19:43 UTC  

you literally would have no backing

2019-12-23 22:19:53 UTC  

after a disastrous war

2019-12-23 22:20:13 UTC  

Everyone is pro violence

2019-12-23 22:20:29 UTC  

Some people just like to hide it under a layer of diffusion

2019-12-23 22:20:53 UTC  

Are you fucking dumb? The brown shirts were pro violence but made the people feel a sense of order

2019-12-23 22:21:09 UTC  

How would the black shirts be any different

2019-12-23 22:22:51 UTC  

The government of England was still strong and stable, and so was the monarchy.

2019-12-23 22:23:53 UTC  

No it wasnt. There was constant arguing between both parties, to the point where partisans were having brawls in the street