Message from @VICTOR117
Discord ID: 658876402673909787
@Deleted User Neo Confederacy would be lit
Southern Florida probably wouldnt even secede with it
But I'd gladly volunteer
Southern Florida’s 90%+ Northerners.
>tfw you live in the county with highest concentration of jews
>boogaloo right around the corner
<:smug:591181720565579807>
uh oh
Living in Palm Beach county has really scuffed my perception of judaism
On one hand I like talking with these old kikes I meet about their glory days, the other they are one of the worst people ever
What does Palm Beach have to offer from them.
@Deleted User Snowbirds
Bunch of boomers who retired recently or moved during the 80s
<:lmao:588490785029226548> <:lmao:588490785029226548> <:lmao:588490785029226548> <:lmao:588490785029226548> <:lmao:588490785029226548>
@Asdrubal AYAHAHAHAH.
<:pogU:537439906595733506>
family mandated gfs are still a thing
based sister gf
HAHA BASED INCEST POSTING
arabic cultures marry cousins to avoid dowrys
makes em tarded
Do you mean most cultures historically?
Look at the habsburgs
Or any village, really
On top of that, incest after a certain point isn't actually terrible dangerous iirc. Mind you, there's the whole "power dynamic" issue which is icky, but I believe having a child in your late 30s/40s poses an equivalent risk as to first(?) cousins having a child
This is the current prevalence.
when it comes to arabs
3 do 30
having older parents is not the same tho, in the case of consanguineous parents it leads to inbreeding which leads to decreased biological fitness of a population and higher risk of accumulating more abnormal homozygotes.
so whilst there is an equivalent risk for chromosomal disorders between older parents and consanguineous parents, consanguinity effects the whole population because people become carriers for recessive deleterious mutations.
also its interesting to note that women aged 35 and older face a lower risk of having children with birth defects known as major congenital malformations, ie the birth defects from being old are not as bad as being related
The imagery of incest is powerful enough to make one wonder to what degree it is in our nature to pursue it, though that may be more cautionary symbolism than a "simon says green-light" type of situation
So like
tf is up with Italy?
Imagine defending the production of inbred coombrains by the false apes as if it’s permissible by any standard
couldn't be me
Things that are anathema to the rules of nature aren’t justifiable, human morality does not precede the natural world and its dictations.
The implication that reclassifying these like incest and miscegenation morally with a neutral stance isn’t the same as arrogantly playing god is mcdumb as well
What's up degenerates
Explaining you feel as though people should be able to do things like this freely doesn’t mean we can suddenly permit these things no matter how verbose your justification. It’s an imperfect world and we aren’t free to do as we please without disastrous consequence.
What on earth are you talking about
QOTD 🔖
What is the meaning of Christmas!!🌲
@everyone
...