Message from @๐ฎ๐๐๐๐
Discord ID: 663854044401500182
@Deleted User The oil fields?
Yes
The US can use them.
the Arabs need to get out of Iran and become a part or their own state
imo
I don't care but oil or oil-backed currency
Two incidents: the UK embassy crisis and the Iran-Iraq war were fueled over Khuzestan.
Okay
smart
The USA is known for mercilessly killing civilians though
The US dollar would collapse under the ridiculous amount of debt it's in unless its value is pinned to a controlled commodity of objective value
They killed Soleimani over a claim that he was *planning* attacks on US military installations; no evidence bearing that has been shown.
and backed with military force
Not because he *did.*
Soleimani was a good boy
he dindu nuffin
Yeah that was just on Israel's orders to destabilize Iran
Well he fuckinโ kept ISIL off from dominating the Levant and Iraq.
the dollar is propped up mostly by war anyway, war would be in americas interest, regardless of casualties or the poltical fallout
And he helped bolster both Syrian and Iraqi governments.
america wants the oil so we're going to secure it no matter how barbaric the means
The US is just a globalist platform not recognizing the definition of national sovereignty.
if it weren't for that, china and eastern nations would be dominating the world economy
Itโs lost its original nationalistic interpretation by the Federalists.
@๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ You think very monolithically it is not helpful
You wanna elaborate on that
No.
Then fuck you
@Deleted User I think it didn't lose its national meaning from the Federalists
I think it lost it during Wilson
and WW1
Wilson even regretted signing over America
Oh no I mean the Federalists made the *original* meaning.
to the "UN" and Rockerfellers
Ohh
ok
Yeah true
They were the ones who defeated the Jeffersonian-Republicans and their disastrous state coalition.
Yes
We saw enough of that model during the Articles of Confederation.