Tehran isn't in the south?

It’s an Arab majority that has attempted secession.

@Deleted User The oil fields?

Yes

The US can use them.

the Arabs need to get out of Iran and become a part or their own state

imo

I don't care but oil or oil-backed currency

Two incidents: the UK embassy crisis and the Iran-Iraq war were fueled over Khuzestan.

Okay

smart

The USA is known for mercilessly killing civilians though

The US dollar would collapse under the ridiculous amount of debt it's in unless its value is pinned to a controlled commodity of objective value

They killed Soleimani over a claim that he was *planning* attacks on US military installations; no evidence bearing that has been shown.

and backed with military force

Not because he *did.*

Soleimani was a good boy

he dindu nuffin

Yeah that was just on Israel's orders to destabilize Iran

Well he fuckin’ kept ISIL off from dominating the Levant and Iraq.

the dollar is propped up mostly by war anyway, war would be in americas interest, regardless of casualties or the poltical fallout

And he helped bolster both Syrian and Iraqi governments.

basically yeah

america wants the oil so we're going to secure it no matter how barbaric the means

The US is just a globalist platform not recognizing the definition of national sovereignty.

if it weren't for that, china and eastern nations would be dominating the world economy

It’s lost its original nationalistic interpretation by the Federalists.

@𝕮𝖊𝖗𝖊𝖘 You think very monolithically it is not helpful

You wanna elaborate on that

No.

Then fuck you

@Deleted User I think it didn't lose its national meaning from the Federalists

I think it lost it during Wilson

and WW1

Wilson even regretted signing over America

Oh no I mean the Federalists made the *original* meaning.

to the "UN" and Rockerfellers

Ohh

ok

Yeah true

They were the ones who defeated the Jeffersonian-Republicans and their disastrous state coalition.