Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 675399110332776518
Their men became complacent
I'm not talking about corruption. Robert C. Allen (2003) for example, explained that the seriousness that the explotation of depleted Siberian steel reserves led to a "cut in productivity in existing operarions, that the led to" vast investments that maintained output with more expensive inputs".
Even if it was a problem of bureaucracy by itself (which im not prone to dent or accept), there were still problems under the Soviet protectorist economic policy.
@Lettow I don't know the full extent of that, I'd have to research it. However I'm certain their protectionist economy __could've__ worked perfectly fine.
Well, maybe the could have survived if they decided to invest all of their resources in civilian industry and tegnology rather than in the military. But still I would be doubtfull of that.
If you wan't to study it I would recommend you "Farm To Factory" by Robert Allen. I even have a summary of the book if you want a copy of it @Maksim
@Lettow That i can agree with, they did not invest enough in civilian and tech industry
natural resources ie Heavy industry, healthcare, finances meaning banks, Public utilities, any type of media, should be state owned. Unions must be nationalized and reorganized into state owned national corporations ie (guilds) do to them perpetuating marxist class war. The corporate state is controlled by politically-unaffiliated representatives of employers, workers and state officials. While the means of production are still in private hands, the capitalist mode of production is abolished, with this Corporatist model replacing it. The Corporatist model seeks a comprise of both worker and employer, who are given equal voting power on any issue passing through said corporations. These corporations must be organized to fit occupations and roles such as by example, a corporation would be created for teaching; doctors; welders;
manufacturing fields; and so on – with syndical regional administrative groups helping the operating corporation. Should either the worker, or the employer, create some mechanism or policy which they feel has significant value, then a facile system shall allow them to submit this idea for scrutiny by the corporate council via the council’s local representative. This council must be comprised of workers within the corporate field, who are democratically elected to the council by the corporations membership. Once the idea has been approved by the council, it will then be put to a vote by the membership of the corporation; upon approval, and provided it poses no conflict to the national interest, it must be introduced into state policy. This mechanism, as well as allowing the regulation of certain fields to be determined by experienced senior workers and employers within that field. National corporations must be in state ownership to ensure that no material factor or any bias from private interest subverts the structure. There shall be one corporation per occupational field nationally, that will also have its own labor court to handle disputes. If decisions cannot be negotiated with outcome the state will simply intervene for a decision. The head of government shall be organized with a “Sovereign”
acting as the national leader, who shall be chosen by a Grand Council, which will be made up of Party leadership, Military high command, and representatives from the Corporations.
This also means setting prices and wages with profit sharing even progressive taxation
@Zoltanous Jesus can I get a summary
@Zoltanous Like some have said before, if you can't summarize in 20 words or less, you prolly need to broaden your understanding of the subject at hand
lmao thats just fucking retarded
could you summarize the idea of quantom relativity in 20 words?
or the critique of capitalism by marx?
it's like 3 paragraphs
can't be that hard to read
@everyone Daily Question 🔖
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Why?
"Life is eternal struggle and those who don't wish to fight, have forfeited their right to live."
i don't think you were supposed to tag everyone friend
but yes, life is an eternal struggle
those who run from the fight perish
Nice Hitler Quote. @Deleted User
Rights are a Christian concept within liberal moral frameworks. Miss me with that
@Draško I am dog
@Deleted User yeee
@Deleted User I agree, weather people like it or not you will always have a challenge in life with no challenge ls no point because there is no difficult task to overcome and learn from
Challenge has no point or meaning outside of what we ascribe to it as well however
Yes, sorta.
This is circular logic
It has a point because we made it a point, it's all on perspective man
Gotta think if it in a 4D way
It's pretty straight forward
You value you that, so you decided it was important
It has not importance outside of that
can i read anything in server that isnt silly edgy teen atheist propaganda
You know many gnostics would agree with me
heretics, sure
Ah, see that's it isn't it