Message from @T. Raven
Discord ID: 666519594374004748
Yea im never going to accept that train of logic
But as long as you follow Christ and try to be the best christian you can, i will respect you regardless of denomination
inb4 catholic egoists come screeching in "muh protestants go to hell"
Epic
African Christians on some shit
"who became popular in 2010 for having a phone call with Jesus Christ"
Im sorry what
Oh dude African pastors are outrageous
There was one I read about who was claiming he could save women by fingering them and shit I think
lmao
Or it was blowjob related I can't remember but it was one of the two
It is considered good luck and strength in Liberia to carry a woman’s severed genitals in your wallet.
We should trust the people who were Kings.
I'd say you gotta be a lucky and strong nigga to aquire such an item in the first place
The entire county is in civil war.
What else is new?
South Sudan.
Yeah you right
question: is there any value for an agnostic to read the bible?
Read the Quran instead
Is there any value for an agnostic to read ancient mesopotamian religious texts?
I'd argue yes
Quran is theologically shitty
They have no prophecies so they have to resort to saying that "People will get together" <- this prophecised phones and social media lmao
The bible is not comparable to some random ancient mesapotamian text, even if you don't believe in the bible, it has much more significance and value
Ok
Both of my parents read it and I kind of want to get a better idea of it
Mathoma is a G
rationality rules > mathoma
"god is not real, deal with it" - Rationality rules
Woag
u actually spent half an hour watching that
lol
@Eoppa does the existence of prescriptive things necessitate god? if so, (i assume you agree) the argument from change (or any ontological argument) presupposes epistomological principles, which by definition necessitate god, so you are presupposing god in the argument in favor of gods existence
Therefore, there needs to be a epistomological justification for the existence of god, since an ontological argument presupposes god and relies on god for its validity
And a conclusion cannot be presupposed in the premises in favor of that same conclusion
oh really?
therefore yahweh is real