If it takes everything in act, it would take all worlds where there also is potency into account too

Is what you're saying that in a universe 1, a coffee is hot, but in universe 2 a cup of coffee is cold, and within universe 1 that coffee is potentially cold? Is that what you mean by different variations of acts while some things remaining in potency

I mean in U1, Coffee is 31 degrees U2, Coffee is 32 degrees, and so forth. Or more relevant to my point, let's say an object can move X to Y or X to Z, etc. None of these can be put together into one meta present

I'll leave my comment about potency out for now

Why can they not?

Because two objects cant occupy the same space

You do realize that makes literally 0 sense right lol

We're talking about seperate universes, they're not occupying same spaces

Then this meta present seems very superficial if it is in no way real

When did i say it was not real? I never said that two objects occupy the same space, I said what the multi verse theory says, which is that there are multiple different universe which are identical but peculiar in some ways

They are not just peculiar in some ways, either it's exhaustive of all potentials or not

Yes they are, and since its an infinite number of universes, all potentials which exist within universe 1 are actualized in universe 2, etc

Yeah, and what I'm saying is if you try to superimpose that into 1 reality you get contradictions and incoherency

How?

What do you mean by 1 reality?

The meta present

I don't think you have the same conception i have of meta present

Probably not

I don't mean that we combine all things from all universes into a single universe, this of course leads to contradictions such as infinite number of things residing in a same place
What i mean by super present, is simply this abstract frame of time from which everything is in actuality and nothing is in potency

Its hard to explain

Well the problem is there isn't 1 act

Why is that a problem?

you need to go to church more often

It's a problem because if there are different ways of actualizing something, there isn't just "in act"

Elaborate?

You can be in act in way Y or way Z, there isn't only one way to be in act, so there would need to be infinite meta presents as well, which defeats the purpose

No that single meta present encompasses all infinite non meta presents which exist simultaniously

Then the metapresent is illusionary

Not vice versa

And that doesn't answer my criticism

There are infinite ways to have everything actual

What's the server stance on Pagans and Occultists?

cool

What's your stance

@Doktor Goon

I am Pagans and occultists

Same

Based

What's your ethnos

Hungary?

Why Hungary?