maybe some nations have employed this?

Empiricism is invalid and unnecessary to prove something as sensical as this
People work because they want the ends they will receive by working (wealth)
If you ensure that the wealth they accumilate by working accelerates as they work more intensly, of course it will incentivize them

Again, it's argumentative, we should try it instead of dismissing it on the basis of "it hasn't been tried yet"

Basic logic can be used here.

Money incentivices people, that's nothing new.

the article literally says that some dudes created some game where they put different events in through algorithm and different skills to people.

it's a pretty shite job but it makes for a killer headline for losers who will indulge in not blaming themselves.

there's empirical data that successful people share a lot of traits as well as successful companies share similar habits and traits.

But hey it's easier to create a game and say you see you just need luck or smth

@Ater Votum My point still stands

isn't your point alluding to the opinion that the article is true?

The productive and successful people will know their ''luck'' depends on how much they push themselves to be the best they can be.

if a person has a cultural or personal mentality that he is not in charge and will resort to ''luck'' he let's go of possibility to gain greater wealth as well as to be as productive as possible to society as he can.

@Maksim

workers control of the means of production

😎

*Oh god...*

<:cringe:591181675426217995>

https://youtu.be/Lntz3AjiVzk

https://youtu.be/0HXpm48xWio

Is malcolm X worth reading?

I’ve been learning more about him recently and i agree with a lot of his thoughts, but i do not want to delve into something not worth while

@Deleted User hes based af

Unironically

I like the new role system

@Deleted User yes

Read Malcolm X and Marcus Garvey

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ayuqizp4fyY

i have lived my entire life without ever watching contrapoints

I'm honestly not a huge fan of her

There's quite a bit of production value, one must confess

I have also never seen contra points

Ok so traditionalism

Y/n

I say the past is dead

Gotta do new stuff to adapt

Nothing to worship in the past

We must push forwards if we are to reach god

contra points

```If you've paid attention then you've heard that men have no idea what the lived experience of a woman is like. That we can't imagine what it's like to have no bodily security, at risk at all times, after dark or in a lonely street, or what it's like to endure the pains of labor. I'll bite that bullet, and note that women fail to mention other experiences unique to their sex: the feeling of erotic compulsion towards beings who could physically overpower them, crush them, smother them; the visceral and overpowering force of their emotions (neurotypically). The reason I will bite that bullet is that it forces us to bite a symmetrical one. The claim is that there’s nothing in male life that women don't know, because men are the architects of the world; this gives us too much credit, and women far too little
Indeed the world of men is inaccessible to women, just as the world of women is inaccessible to men.```