Message from @Koninos
Discord ID: 684086484718059534
Discord is pretty strict about it
^
All big tech administration is handled by bots or people with brightly colored hair that hate us
damn the IRA were fucking cool @Asdrubal
Not the IRA
Pigs
how dare you @Asdrubal
i'll shit on your potato stew
That photo is from the 1967 race riot in Detroit
Dark times.
oh were they rioting as to who should of won a race?
sorry - not very educated.
Segregation and that shiet
oh right
like osmosis
Ye
💀
To end the disturbance.
national guard*
States don't have armies @Koninos
You know what I mean.
Yeah I do
Anyways
Present your argument against idealism
First of all
Go.
I'd like for you to exhibit where I called idealism untruthy and ridiculous.
Just so I can get a picture of where you're coming from with this
Or whether or not you're going off of pure inference
I'm well acquainted with the typical types of the right-wingers with their aggressive tactics
By asserting that idealism is for the weak minded, and right after that asserting that the real truth is that after we die, we don't know anything, you've indirectly rejected idealism
by saying its for the weak minded, you obviously implied it was ridiculous, since if its for the weak minded, the only reason people would adopt the belief was to cope
This is basic social cues 101
First of all - I'll acknowledge my theory as to what idealism really is and what it's purpose is.
Idealism is nothing more than a tool of crowd control - used to build civilisations and societies by instilling social norms, morales and a moral compass.
The original intention with demanding a debate here was to substantiate your implicit rejection of idealism, which you thus far haven't done. The only thing you have done was repeatedly re assert that idealism is ridiculous, and is a coping mechanism used by the weak to compensate
Are you listening then
I am listening, hence my response calling out what you're just doing