what do you mean "justifies"

Why are you an anarchist

if my goal is to reduce the authority that holds sway over me, anarchism is the only solution.

and that is my goal

Why is that your goal

You a Stirner fan?

because i am all that matters to me. if something were to restrict me in my action i want to remove it

i don't hold any other cause above my own

Well I mean why. You seem to be dangerously close to just collapsing into psychological egoism which holds very little explanatory power imo.

Isn't Anarcho-capitalism the same thing?

anarcho-capitalism is a specific economic system

it's not even inherently egoistic

Well if he's against all authority then he should oppose the capital system

But what I'm asking is why do you want no restrictions?

i'm against all authority that has the capacity of limiting my will

If you are drunk and are about to kill, rape, or commit suicide, would you not be grateful for someone controlling you?

if i *wanted* to do those things, then no i wouldn't. since i don't want to do those things i don't think there should be someone controlling me to not do something that i wasn't interested in doing

However you certainly will regret it later no? You hold this view of the will as an unchanging perfect absolute.

It contradicts itself, your actions now hold authority over your future

That's why we regret putting ourselves in full body casts

Regret is the bane of your system here

i don't think of it as "perfect" or "absolute." if others help me in achieving what i want it's not so much authority as it is how i can achieve what i want. if i regret something i will try to fix it in what ways i can. but in general, if i can help it, i want to restrict what can hamper my will. I *understand and believe* that others exist with the capacity to exact their will on me as well and i respect that. i wouldn't want to restrict *others* will (if they're intentions weren't to harm me or those i cared about) as i wouldn't want them to do the same to me.

i'm not delusional that i can remove others abilities, just the *systems* that others put into place that restrict my will

The problem is your will is contradictory

Your will in the future is not the same

So in others preserving your future self they subject your present self

And yet you commend them for it because it is furthering your future will

This is horribly unsound

i'm not talking about abolishing *every single instance of my will being manipulated or constrained*. i'm not omnipotent. it's obvious to me that i can't literally do anything i can imagine so thinking that. It's not contradictory because i'm looking to abolish sources of authority that i can, i assumed you could understand that on your own.

i can't control time, and i can't voluntarily move through time

so saying my actions now will affect my future is obvious, i can only do that which is possible

That's not my contention at all though

My problem is that you would commend someone for preserving your future will, with and action now, right?

in that specific scenario i wouldn't object because that's what is helping my now. my intentions will change and what i want will change, and i accept that as a fact of the universe

Except it contradicts your current will.

Which you seek to eliminate, you don't have a sound system

if my will is to not kill someone and someone helps me, they aren't restricting me

they're aiding me

if i'm drunk, i'm not of clear mind and one could say that the intoxicants are restricting what i would want if i wasn't intoxicated

which is my default state

Well my situation is if your will now will put yourself in a full body cast, and someone preserves you...