Takes londer to load

No it's not.

oh with a sabot?

Rofl.

@Tea what's the point of riffling then smartie

Aye a sabot, nothing else is used for a rifled, they're the same.

@ky HESH rounds.

Why Britain still uses it.

We also cant share some other 120mm rounds with other nato countries.

hesh gay

We use rifled lmao

What i said

you mongo

which is more accurate

im coming from a marksman pov i know next to nothing about artillery

you mong

No..

It's not

Lo

l

Royal ordancence got cucked by rhinemetal.

Abrams is more accurate firing their DU APFSDS in 2-part than our 3-part.

They're more accurate at tank killing.

Other than that they're basically the same.

Yes, rifling is way more accurate than unrifled @THCVee

Many years ago the British infantry had muskets, lots and lots of muskets, they could fire faster. But they also had small groups of dudes with rifles, rifles were more accurate and could be used to take out officers or harass opponent muskets but they had a lower firing rate.

Abrams has a better ballistics computer.

It doesnt decrease range either

Photo of my dog

leopard epic stabalization

Rifling of the barrel imparts spin on the projectile, improving ballistic accuracy.

Fucking hell whiski

Those thermal camoflage tiles by BAE looked cool, it makes tanks look almost invisable on thermal imaging.

thats a black ass dog

I'm sorry the lights are off

Do you fucking read

Our guns, are still more accurate with rifiling

Invisible tanks when?

@Deleted User no dog? Id fortnite dance to that

10/10

Not with APFSDS they're not.