Abrams is more accurate firing their DU APFSDS in 2-part than our 3-part.

They're more accurate at tank killing.

Other than that they're basically the same.

Yes, rifling is way more accurate than unrifled @THCVee

Many years ago the British infantry had muskets, lots and lots of muskets, they could fire faster. But they also had small groups of dudes with rifles, rifles were more accurate and could be used to take out officers or harass opponent muskets but they had a lower firing rate.

Abrams has a better ballistics computer.

It doesnt decrease range either

Photo of my dog

leopard epic stabalization

Rifling of the barrel imparts spin on the projectile, improving ballistic accuracy.

Fucking hell whiski

Those thermal camoflage tiles by BAE looked cool, it makes tanks look almost invisable on thermal imaging.

thats a black ass dog

I'm sorry the lights are off

Do you fucking read

Our guns, are still more accurate with rifiling

Invisible tanks when?

@Deleted User no dog? Id fortnite dance to that

10/10

Not with APFSDS they're not.

you fucking mongo

google it

i suppose with a guidance system it overcomes the need for the rifling @Tea

We cant share rouds with other nato allies

Yes, i'm aware

@THCVee Exactly

@General 4 you got Markus earlier, he's too proud to admit it though

aye makes sense then

should have just said that, Tea

I did fucking say that

@General 4 it was fucking hilarious when he noticed your pfp

https://youtu.be/on816Shzc1I

The reason we use rifled is due it being fired slower for the HESH rounds

@Dimorac dont interrupt our convo, who even are you? random nerd. Smh

I thought mods werent supposed to be autistic

@PiereThePineapple give me your memes you cunt

30 sums up a good bit of general and shitposting

but it's still more accurate in paper against the abrams gun alone

Oof

@ky I fucking said that

Fucking OOF

@Deleted User whomst dafuq b u?