Message from @Endecros
Discord ID: 536663999220285441
@AK nigga how low res is your discord?
Beep beep
lettuce?
It was someone elses cap and I copied it without opening and expanding
jpeg of a jpeg... ***nice ***😎
@AK it was mine u theif
That's so low quality. Jeez
ayyyyyyy finally i hear a crash from my place
hear fuckheads flooring it all the time
Jpeg me harder
someone came off a bike
Nice
@AK I think i need to put glasses over ma glasses to read that!
*Enhance*
How's everyone doing?
let's not
@Unfair Trade ah see now that I can read
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqspUltAOf8 Alex Rudinger is literally an android
Can we make it an actual blur though
@AstroTorch oh it looks like something to do with the scottish legal system, and thus i'd not know much about it, some kinda latin legal principle, old common law or something
oohh okay
nevermind thanks for looking it up at least
aye its np
The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then the Bigfoot Trailer #1 (2019)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFHJMBQIav0
google has a definition. seems like some way to resolve a case by relaxing the interpretation of the law slightly
ah yeah, similar to the doctrines in equity though they only usually apply in civil law...
```NOBILE OFFICIUM, n.phr. Sc. Law: the power of equitable jurisdiction possessed by the Court of Session in cases where the law itself does not provide a clear remedy```
``` The courts of Scotland have never recognised a division between the normal common law and equity, and as such the Court of Session (the supreme civil court of Scotland) has exercised an equitable and inherent jurisdiction called the nobile officium. The nobile officium enables the Court to provide a legal remedy where statute or the common law are silent, and prevent mistakes in procedure or practice that would lead to injustice. ```
seems positive
hmm
means the judges can just be like "hahaa, our law is kinda harsh... yea lets not follow that this time
considering the only case they have is had by ignoring context and trying to do it strictly by the book, this seems like a large step in the right direction
he should challenge the uk government in the courtroom of judge judy
Let's see it
haha i cant imagine anything like that happening here, only flexing of the rules in the opposite
also cant image the db following precedent either...
idk if this/equity always results in better outcomes. maybe they just decide the initial ruling was fair. i can't even remember what it was
markus in court though
:3
<:Pepega:533727176734933004>
still not the biggest forehead here, even with the edit