@Euro Nigga It's hard to leave something you like.

I thought I had a bad sense of time

@AstroTorch wait what?

man that was some good eatin

Lmao compression

i dunno what that is haha

@󠀀󠀀AK nigga how low res is your discord?

Beep beep

lettuce?

It was someone elses cap and I copied it without opening and expanding

jpeg of a jpeg... ***nice ***😎

@󠀀󠀀AK it was mine u theif

That's so low quality. Jeez

ayyyyyyy finally i hear a crash from my place

hear fuckheads flooring it all the time

Jpeg me harder

someone came off a bike

Nice

@󠀀󠀀AK I think i need to put glasses over ma glasses to read that!

*Enhance*

How's everyone doing?

let's not

@Unfair Trade ah see now that I can read

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqspUltAOf8 Alex Rudinger is literally an android

Can we make it an actual blur though

@AstroTorch oh it looks like something to do with the scottish legal system, and thus i'd not know much about it, some kinda latin legal principle, old common law or something

oohh okay

nevermind thanks for looking it up at least

aye its np

The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then the Bigfoot Trailer #1 (2019)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFHJMBQIav0

google has a definition. seems like some way to resolve a case by relaxing the interpretation of the law slightly

ah yeah, similar to the doctrines in equity though they only usually apply in civil law...

```NOBILE OFFICIUM, n.phr. Sc. Law: the power of equitable jurisdiction possessed by the Court of Session in cases where the law itself does not provide a clear remedy```
``` The courts of Scotland have never recognised a division between the normal common law and equity, and as such the Court of Session (the supreme civil court of Scotland) has exercised an equitable and inherent jurisdiction called the nobile officium. The nobile officium enables the Court to provide a legal remedy where statute or the common law are silent, and prevent mistakes in procedure or practice that would lead to injustice. ```

seems positive

hmm

means the judges can just be like "hahaa, our law is kinda harsh... yea lets not follow that this time

considering the only case they have is had by ignoring context and trying to do it strictly by the book, this seems like a large step in the right direction

he should challenge the uk government in the courtroom of judge judy

Let's see it

haha i cant imagine anything like that happening here, only flexing of the rules in the opposite