"the characteristics of the market economy which determine economic activity remain essentially unimpaired."

he never talked about definition

Mises, L. von. 1998 [1940]. Interventionism: An Economic Analysis (trans. Thomas Francis McManus and Heinrich Bund). Foundation for Economic Education, Inc., Irvington-on-Hudson, NY.

I mean the context

like the wording before

after

not when it was said lol

so wait, what economic system do you think the USA uses side?

You can't interpret his quotes to fit your liking

I don't need to give you anything

His quote is clear

@t r u e a market economy

not free market

Sure no context

then he said

That's not an argument

"the characteristics of the market economy which determine economic activity remain essentially unimpaired."
he never talked about definition, he just said the market would be uneffected

as per my interpretation

That's not an argument

You interpret him wrong, he would beat the fuck out of you

man, you are just murdering definitions left and right

^

except theres no context

so I can interpret it

as I wish

you, unlike many others, deserve exactly what you get with capitalism

"this still does not make for a mixed system which would combine socialism and private property. " he's clearly talking about Capitalism

Cool because we don't have capitalism

but he's not since theres no context

So you are disagreeing with your own father

You should be stoned to death

"“Thus the market in the capitalist economy is the process regulating production and consumption. It is the nerve-center of the capitalist system. Through it the orders of the consumers are transmitted to the producers, and the smooth functioning of the economic system is secured thereby. The market prices establish themselves at the level which equates demand and supply. When, other things being equal, more goods are brought to the market, prices fall; when, other things being equal, demand increases, prices rise."

Is the context

"Thus the market in the capitalist economy is the process regulating production and consumption. It is the nerve-center of the capitalist system."

alright where is the page

you got it from

There is no rhetoric at all to your argument

link the page

5

link the page tho