Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 540541465265438720
Dems want white genocide
@s t a i n e d g l a s sWe must destroy the rotton cancer of liberalism
It’s a mental illness. Good luck
@s t a i n e d g l a s s nuke war now
And they put chemicals into the water. Turns the frogs gay
Nuke war now
End this world
Calm down there partner
@s t a i n e d g l a s s did you swim in the water?
based morning star is SIEGEPILLED
@Mr1Gonzalez no. Alex Jones did tho
Gays - Hate catholics but loves muslims
Muslims - illegalize homosexuality and literally murder gays
gays - WE LOVE MUSLIMS
I dont understand their thinking.
Seriously though
Alot of gays hate Christianity.
But like Islam.
Some hate both though.
@Neco2040 @wahx @Anon365 @Toro https://www.mercatus.org/publications/federal-fiscal-policy/costs-national-single-payer-healthcare-system?utm_source=bridge&utm_medium=bridgepost&utm_campaign=medicareforall
“M4A would add approximately $32.6 trillion to federal budget commitments during the first 10 years of its implementation (2022–2031).
This projected increase in federal healthcare commitments would equal approximately 10.7 percent of GDP in 2022. This amount would rise to nearly 12.7 percent of GDP in 2031 and continue to rise thereafter.
These estimates are conservative because they assume the legislation achieves its sponsors’ goals of dramatically reducing payments to health providers, in addition to substantially reducing drug prices and administrative costs.
A doubling of all currently projected federal individual and corporate income tax collections would be insufficient to finance the added federal costs of the plan. “
“➢ The plan is underfinanced by an average of nearly $1.1 trillion per year. The Sanders campaign estimates the average annual financing of the plan at $1.377 trillion per year between 2017 and 2026. Over the same time period, we estimate the average financing requirements of $2.47 trillion per year--about $1.1 trillion more on average per year over the same time period. We present results in table 2 showing the Sanders’ financing plan. However we also do an analysis of the additional taxes needed to pay for the $1.1 trillion underfinancing. This would require an increase in the payroll tax from 6.2% to 14.3% and an increase in the income related premium from 2.2% to 5.7% -- a combined 20 percent tax on income. In light of the overall scope of the Sanders’ financing proposals, additional marginal tax increases on families over $250,000 seam unrealistic. The results are presented in Table 3 This financing requirement is similar to the tax increases needed to finance the proposed Vermont single payer plan.”
https://www.healthcare-now.org/296831690-Kenneth-Thorpe-s-analysis-of-Bernie-Sanders-s-single-payer-proposal.pdf
M4H is Bernie’s Medicare for all plan
This is not even including the quality and waiting time problems just will be worsened due to the increased state intrtvention
The Mercatus Center has ties to many right-wing groups
try again
That’s not a rebuttal
Just because it has bias does not mean the study is invalid
If that was the case we would have no studies that are valid
So I can effectively dismiss any global warming studies
Why was I tagged?
@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ why was I tagged
medicare
for all
Is there something you want to discuss...?
Usually you just lecture people and don’t want to have a conversation so idk why you tagged me
discuss M4A?
Uh, yeah? Haha
Lmao do you like have a question for me or what is this
Whats ur views on it
I like it, it will likely give more people access to health care
Estimates I’ve seen say it adds 30 million Americans to health care