Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 545351704023924746
Due to not being able to charge google more money?
yes
If you're charging everyone the same no matter how much they use, the smaller companies lose out
You’re saying smaller companies can now make slightly more money by charging different companies different bandwidths
So now it’s more likely for there to be smaller isps because there’s more profit opportunity?
Not slightly, alot more
theres a lower barriet to entry now
More competition
But the domains have no incentive. Internet coverage is very broad already, so if a smaller isp is like imma charge google more for more bandwidth, google can just say eh don’t have us on your service, and no one will use that service
It's more of the consumers getting charged higher
Well the consumers won’t choose that either
then let competition decide
Currently it's almost impossible let them in
I mean I agree with that, I just don’t think this changes that
well was before it got repealed
It's a huge regulatory burden
But I guess we will see
so far higher speeds
but this is far from putting the fire out
There are zoning laws which actively prohibit ISPs from competing in some places, creating monopolies
Zoning laws have to repealed
That’s a deregulation I can get behind
Would rather just have state run isps but whatever
What about free public WiFi in cities
“Free? You mean STOLEN from the taxpayers??”
Or co-op Internet providers
@wahx state run would be inefficient
And probably costlier
But atleast you can get behind that deregulation
But you should then be able to get behind allowing insurance companies to compete inter states
Which is currently banned
Muslims should be accepted?
So terrorists should be accepted?
Islam promotes violence and oppression of females.
"Behead those who think Islam is violent"
Only Moderate Muslims should be accepted
What’s “moderate”
Someone who doesn't discriminate
Anon is not a liberal now?