Message from @powerlifter
Discord ID: 488414725697306626
That's why he's not pursuing criminal case, thought about it moron?
LMAO they didnt make the document MORON. They only burried the case.
Whomp whomp
LOW INFORMATION
We're talking with a biased puppet
Yup
Low paid shill or really dumb activist.
I thought about boot but it became comical
Why are they not pursuing a criminal case in through this treaty? Maybe because his evidence is based on rumors not evidence?
POLITICO spoke with more than a dozen current and former officials from across the national security spectrum, including intelligence agencies, the State Department and the Pentagon. Almost all said they were aware of Russia’s aggressive cyberespionage and disinformation campaigns — especially after the dramatic Russian attempt to hack Ukrainian elections in 2014 — but felt that either the White House or key agencies were unwilling to act forcefully to counter the Russian actions.
MuELlER WaS FiReD FrOm tHE FBI
Okay quote me the evidence
I'm not reading the entire thing
You only appeal to authority
They said X.
We both can play that game, as I just copy/pasted what they've said
This guy isn’t a right winger. I’m telling you guys.
So learn how to make a proper argument puppet, rather than posting 50 pages of nothing.
Your only argument is : they said they did intervene!!!
Ofcourse he isn't a right winger.
Lolol I'm reading some lines here and here I'm reading Russian paid "trolls" on social media HAHAHAHA
Tell me with your own words.
Where is the evidence in here?
Do you think if I shout on twitter: EVERYONE ELECT TRUMP! I'll be intervening elections?
I really wanna see some kind of logic in your evidence
"evidence"
Well I can handle it way more than you.
You base your hatred on Trump based on media 😉
And at the end of the day, president were democratically elected.
was*
If you want to censor outside influence that would surpress freedom of speech
And that's basically your logic
You have zero reasoning
Everyone can be affected.
But this goes againts your point
Considering media negative coverage for Trump was like 90 %
Konig, any last evidence or arguments?, we have seen none so far
Ofcourse we haven't.
He has no idea how to present ones.
He's going to post PDF and if he likes the headline, he'll call it evidence.