Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 488413824647430144


2018-09-09 18:16:16 UTC  

There is zero evidence

2018-09-09 18:16:50 UTC  

That the Russian messed with the elections in Trump's favor, infact let me get other source of some Russian spies getting funded by Clinton Campaign

2018-09-09 18:18:41 UTC  

Speaking of FBI? The one that burried (in DC) the case for the DOJ's indictment for Lee, that was for HRC email indictments?

2018-09-09 18:19:11 UTC  

Where does it say on Robert Mueller's Wikipedia page that he was ever fired?

2018-09-09 18:19:14 UTC  

Evidence, evidence, evidence πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

2018-09-09 18:19:19 UTC  

From your bias FBI source?

2018-09-09 18:19:26 UTC  

Mueller left the FBI in 2013.

What the fuck is even your point?

2018-09-09 18:19:37 UTC  

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

2018-09-09 18:19:54 UTC  

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/07/13/gru.indictment.pdf This was burried by FBI and thankfully revved up in 2017 with followin arrest. It was languished for β€œunclear reasons” in obama years.

2018-09-09 18:20:26 UTC  

Hilarious you accusing me of not even looking at it

2018-09-09 18:20:42 UTC  

πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418667927169138688/488413456635265042/image0.png

2018-09-09 18:20:57 UTC  

Hahaha

2018-09-09 18:21:02 UTC  

Mueller is a joke, ZERO evidence

2018-09-09 18:21:09 UTC  

That's why he's not pursuing criminal case, thought about it moron?

2018-09-09 18:21:21 UTC  

LMAO they didnt make the document MORON. They only burried the case.

2018-09-09 18:21:23 UTC  

Whomp whomp

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418667927169138688/488413627418804245/image0.png

2018-09-09 18:21:32 UTC  

LOW INFORMATION

2018-09-09 18:21:34 UTC  

We're talking with a biased puppet

2018-09-09 18:21:53 UTC  

Yup

2018-09-09 18:22:10 UTC  

Low paid shill or really dumb activist.

2018-09-09 18:22:34 UTC  

I thought about boot but it became comical

2018-09-09 18:22:48 UTC  

Why are they not pursuing a criminal case in through this treaty? Maybe because his evidence is based on rumors not evidence?

2018-09-09 18:23:44 UTC  

POLITICO spoke with more than a dozen current and former officials from across the national security spectrum, including intelligence agencies, the State Department and the Pentagon. Almost all said they were aware of Russia’s aggressive cyberespionage and disinformation campaigns β€” especially after the dramatic Russian attempt to hack Ukrainian elections in 2014 β€” but felt that either the White House or key agencies were unwilling to act forcefully to counter the Russian actions.

2018-09-09 18:23:51 UTC  

MuELlER WaS FiReD FrOm tHE FBI

2018-09-09 18:23:59 UTC  

Okay quote me the evidence

2018-09-09 18:24:02 UTC  

I'm not reading the entire thing

2018-09-09 18:24:07 UTC  

You only appeal to authority

2018-09-09 18:24:09 UTC  

They said X.

2018-09-09 18:24:19 UTC  

We both can play that game, as I just copy/pasted what they've said

2018-09-09 18:24:29 UTC  

This guy isn’t a right winger. I’m telling you guys.

2018-09-09 18:25:13 UTC  

So learn how to make a proper argument puppet, rather than posting 50 pages of nothing.

2018-09-09 18:25:20 UTC  

Your only argument is : they said they did intervene!!!

2018-09-09 18:25:37 UTC  

Ofcourse he isn't a right winger.

2018-09-09 18:25:44 UTC  

His arguments are appealed based on emotions

2018-09-09 18:26:50 UTC  

Lolol I'm reading some lines here and here I'm reading Russian paid "trolls" on social media HAHAHAHA

2018-09-09 18:27:13 UTC  

Tell me with your own words.

2018-09-09 18:27:18 UTC  

Where is the evidence in here?

2018-09-09 18:27:36 UTC  

Do you think if I shout on twitter: EVERYONE ELECT TRUMP! I'll be intervening elections?

2018-09-09 18:27:48 UTC  

I really wanna see some kind of logic in your evidence

2018-09-09 18:27:54 UTC  

"evidence"