Why are they not pursuing a criminal case in through this treaty? Maybe because his evidence is based on rumors not evidence?

POLITICO spoke with more than a dozen current and former officials from across the national security spectrum, including intelligence agencies, the State Department and the Pentagon. Almost all said they were aware of Russia’s aggressive cyberespionage and disinformation campaigns — especially after the dramatic Russian attempt to hack Ukrainian elections in 2014 — but felt that either the White House or key agencies were unwilling to act forcefully to counter the Russian actions.

MuELlER WaS FiReD FrOm tHE FBI

Okay quote me the evidence

I'm not reading the entire thing

You only appeal to authority

They said X.

We both can play that game, as I just copy/pasted what they've said

This guy isn’t a right winger. I’m telling you guys.

So learn how to make a proper argument puppet, rather than posting 50 pages of nothing.

Your only argument is : they said they did intervene!!!

Ofcourse he isn't a right winger.

His arguments are appealed based on emotions

Lolol I'm reading some lines here and here I'm reading Russian paid "trolls" on social media HAHAHAHA

Tell me with your own words.

Where is the evidence in here?

Do you think if I shout on twitter: EVERYONE ELECT TRUMP! I'll be intervening elections?

I really wanna see some kind of logic in your evidence

"evidence"

Well I can handle it way more than you.

You base your hatred on Trump based on media 😉

And at the end of the day, president were democratically elected.

was*

If you want to censor outside influence that would surpress freedom of speech

And that's basically your logic

You have zero reasoning

Everyone can be affected.

But this goes againts your point

Considering media negative coverage for Trump was like 90 %

Konig, any last evidence or arguments?, we have seen none so far

Ofcourse we haven't.

He has no idea how to present ones.

He's going to post PDF and if he likes the headline, he'll call it evidence.

Yes, your point being?

You can influence someone but it doesn't mean you're going to persuade him.

Anywho, I've provided you evidence how Russians were paid and benefited Clinton for her elections... You on the other hand

What have you done?

You've provided a PDF where there are paid TWITTER trolls, but little do you know that you lack any sort of knowledge on marketing in the first place.

Did he rage quit?

lol, gone

Haha ofcourse