Notice how we're displaying all the evidence altho burden of proof is on him.

Nope

Want me to answer who is that US person?

Mueller wasn’t fired.

Be more specific

maybe you'll have to do some hearing

reading*

Hahahahaha!!!

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

Screenshotted lmao

xD

I wish.

I'd hope, their investigation has ZERO credible evidence whatsoever - it's based on rumors.

Actually, I think they won't even be pursuing a criminal case in this treaty

Because they got no evidence

And opposition research from intelligence mercenaries using ironically Russian sources

Nope. You’re thinking of someone else.

There is zero evidence

That the Russian messed with the elections in Trump's favor, infact let me get other source of some Russian spies getting funded by Clinton Campaign

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/07/13/gru.indictment.pdf

Speaking of FBI? The one that burried (in DC) the case for the DOJ's indictment for Lee, that was for HRC email indictments?

Where does it say on Robert Mueller's Wikipedia page that he was ever fired?

Evidence, evidence, evidence 😂 😂 😂 😂

From your bias FBI source?

Mueller left the FBI in 2013.

What the fuck is even your point?

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/07/13/gru.indictment.pdf This was burried by FBI and thankfully revved up in 2017 with followin arrest. It was languished for “unclear reasons” in obama years.

Hilarious you accusing me of not even looking at it

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

Hahaha

Mueller is a joke, ZERO evidence

That's why he's not pursuing criminal case, thought about it moron?

LMAO they didnt make the document MORON. They only burried the case.

Whomp whomp

LOW INFORMATION

We're talking with a biased puppet

Yup

Low paid shill or really dumb activist.

I thought about boot but it became comical

Why are they not pursuing a criminal case in through this treaty? Maybe because his evidence is based on rumors not evidence?

POLITICO spoke with more than a dozen current and former officials from across the national security spectrum, including intelligence agencies, the State Department and the Pentagon. Almost all said they were aware of Russia’s aggressive cyberespionage and disinformation campaigns — especially after the dramatic Russian attempt to hack Ukrainian elections in 2014 — but felt that either the White House or key agencies were unwilling to act forcefully to counter the Russian actions.