Message from @wahx

Discord ID: 497911808431226892


2018-10-05 23:20:37 UTC  

sanctuary cities, don't forget about that

2018-10-05 23:20:49 UTC  

that is a large proponent of open borders yes

2018-10-05 23:21:01 UTC  

open borders also relating to terror

2018-10-05 23:21:03 UTC  

Ok but I even see these as being secondary to more core issues. Why are those issues important?

2018-10-05 23:21:05 UTC  

sjw commie libtards lmao

2018-10-05 23:21:16 UTC  

you rang

2018-10-05 23:21:20 UTC  

because at least for us

2018-10-05 23:21:37 UTC  

we believe these things make a country less free and more likely to be under tyranny in some form

2018-10-05 23:21:43 UTC  

I'm English

2018-10-05 23:21:46 UTC  

for example

2018-10-05 23:22:04 UTC  

Cornwall, largely separate from Englands problems

2018-10-05 23:22:39 UTC  

but England has a very large government and bureaucracy that makes fixing problems such as open ish borders a major problem

2018-10-05 23:22:46 UTC  

You know @wahx , you brought up the point "moving towards those goals should be 'winning', not cucking the libs". Unfortunately there's a tremendous bias from libs to whatever trump does (which are wins)

2018-10-05 23:23:07 UTC  

and you know the only way we can get these things done due to the libs being so stubborn

2018-10-05 23:23:08 UTC  

as well as the thinking of a more diverse culture is a better culture, which to a degree may be better

2018-10-05 23:23:11 UTC  

is by a red wave

2018-10-05 23:23:14 UTC  

and there's a tremendous bias from conservatives to whatever trump does... as evidenced by your parenthesis after

2018-10-05 23:23:19 UTC  

but at a very specific percentage

2018-10-05 23:23:29 UTC  

things go from perfectly fine to horrible

2018-10-05 23:23:34 UTC  

thats England

2018-10-05 23:23:45 UTC  

Ok but let's pull back a sec. Redd I think you hit the core thing you're worried about: freedoms being hurt by various factors right?

2018-10-05 23:23:53 UTC  

yes

2018-10-05 23:24:01 UTC  

taxes government being too big and such

2018-10-05 23:24:03 UTC  

Let's say that's a problem, and largely I agree, that should be protected

2018-10-05 23:24:13 UTC  

continue

2018-10-05 23:24:14 UTC  

So we want our citizens to be safe and secure right

2018-10-05 23:24:22 UTC  

exactly

2018-10-05 23:24:34 UTC  

I'm just like establishing the good faith of this conversation, we have the same interests at heart

2018-10-05 23:24:48 UTC  

We want our people to prosper, in terms of health and finances

2018-10-05 23:24:54 UTC  

all of our people, rich and poor yea

2018-10-05 23:25:03 UTC  

yes

2018-10-05 23:25:10 UTC  

At least to the extent of a meritocracy

2018-10-05 23:25:11 UTC  

ok cool

2018-10-05 23:25:35 UTC  

So, we want our people to do great. Awesome. Now, there's the question: does a larger government hamper that ability

2018-10-05 23:25:51 UTC  

I assume via beaurocratic inefficiency...?

2018-10-05 23:25:55 UTC  

I spelled that wrong

2018-10-05 23:25:56 UTC  

Frankly the point is, we can't work together if that's what you are trying to say. Also the libs points are pretty garbage, so stumping them is pretty fun

2018-10-05 23:26:01 UTC  

for the most part no, BUT it does hamper freedoms

2018-10-05 23:26:11 UTC  

If you want progress, don't talk to the libs

2018-10-05 23:26:28 UTC  

Dude what I'm a lib talking to you right now about progress you're the one not wanting to talk about this

2018-10-05 23:26:32 UTC  

In a sense, we're doing both