Message from @wahx

Discord ID: 497911675807203339


2018-10-05 23:19:52 UTC  

let's be more specific maybe?

2018-10-05 23:20:14 UTC  

large goverment

2018-10-05 23:20:27 UTC  

higher taxes

2018-10-05 23:20:34 UTC  

open borders

2018-10-05 23:20:37 UTC  

sanctuary cities, don't forget about that

2018-10-05 23:20:49 UTC  

that is a large proponent of open borders yes

2018-10-05 23:21:01 UTC  

open borders also relating to terror

2018-10-05 23:21:03 UTC  

Ok but I even see these as being secondary to more core issues. Why are those issues important?

2018-10-05 23:21:05 UTC  

sjw commie libtards lmao

2018-10-05 23:21:16 UTC  

you rang

2018-10-05 23:21:20 UTC  

because at least for us

2018-10-05 23:21:37 UTC  

we believe these things make a country less free and more likely to be under tyranny in some form

2018-10-05 23:21:43 UTC  

I'm English

2018-10-05 23:21:46 UTC  

for example

2018-10-05 23:22:04 UTC  

Cornwall, largely separate from Englands problems

2018-10-05 23:22:39 UTC  

but England has a very large government and bureaucracy that makes fixing problems such as open ish borders a major problem

2018-10-05 23:22:46 UTC  

You know @wahx , you brought up the point "moving towards those goals should be 'winning', not cucking the libs". Unfortunately there's a tremendous bias from libs to whatever trump does (which are wins)

2018-10-05 23:23:07 UTC  

and you know the only way we can get these things done due to the libs being so stubborn

2018-10-05 23:23:08 UTC  

as well as the thinking of a more diverse culture is a better culture, which to a degree may be better

2018-10-05 23:23:11 UTC  

is by a red wave

2018-10-05 23:23:14 UTC  

and there's a tremendous bias from conservatives to whatever trump does... as evidenced by your parenthesis after

2018-10-05 23:23:19 UTC  

but at a very specific percentage

2018-10-05 23:23:29 UTC  

things go from perfectly fine to horrible

2018-10-05 23:23:34 UTC  

thats England

2018-10-05 23:23:45 UTC  

Ok but let's pull back a sec. Redd I think you hit the core thing you're worried about: freedoms being hurt by various factors right?

2018-10-05 23:23:53 UTC  

yes

2018-10-05 23:24:01 UTC  

taxes government being too big and such

2018-10-05 23:24:03 UTC  

Let's say that's a problem, and largely I agree, that should be protected

2018-10-05 23:24:13 UTC  

continue

2018-10-05 23:24:14 UTC  

So we want our citizens to be safe and secure right

2018-10-05 23:24:22 UTC  

exactly

2018-10-05 23:24:34 UTC  

I'm just like establishing the good faith of this conversation, we have the same interests at heart

2018-10-05 23:24:48 UTC  

We want our people to prosper, in terms of health and finances

2018-10-05 23:24:54 UTC  

all of our people, rich and poor yea

2018-10-05 23:25:03 UTC  

yes

2018-10-05 23:25:10 UTC  

At least to the extent of a meritocracy

2018-10-05 23:25:11 UTC  

ok cool

2018-10-05 23:25:35 UTC  

So, we want our people to do great. Awesome. Now, there's the question: does a larger government hamper that ability

2018-10-05 23:25:51 UTC  

I assume via beaurocratic inefficiency...?

2018-10-05 23:25:55 UTC  

I spelled that wrong

2018-10-05 23:25:56 UTC  

Frankly the point is, we can't work together if that's what you are trying to say. Also the libs points are pretty garbage, so stumping them is pretty fun