Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 533778422388752385
That’s a myth itself
Like I said, if we avoid discussion about central banking for a minute, I think gold-backed currency has problems that you could agree on.
As in, most of the later 1800s, there was a rising demand for currency coupled with a constant supply that squeezed creditors and restrained the economy.
Plus, new gold discoveries can cause inflation too.
And if someone tried to corner the market on gold, that could cause a huge problem for the money supply.
Not to mention that gold is just hard to use and move around.
A non-inflationary, central-bank-less fiat would be likely better.
See hays the problem , with FIAT currencies, it has no value. The only reason it’s used is because the state gives its value. Increases in money supply causes inflation for this. However for gold, a higher gold supply would increase the supply for money but would not cause inflation as it is is backed by some incentric value.
1800s did not have restrained growth? It was a rapid expansion.
We can’t have a central bank less, non inflationary FIAT . It is impossible
The problem about moving gold around is hardly a problem
How is it impossible?
If there's a private business contracted by the government to keep inflation at 0% by issuing currency strictly to meet demand
Which is impossible as central planning will fail
And 1800s were a time of expansion, which drove the money shortage and the rise in debt burden for much of the country.
As we’ve seen with the GED
How is that impossible?
FED
because central planning fails
But it's incredibly minimal central planning, if it can even be called that
It's not like the current Fed can't keep inflation around 2%
The government controlling the money supply is strictly central planning
because it isn’t
The business would control the money supply
And it’s not supposed to keep it around 2%
The fed's target rn is 2%
if the businesses controlled money supply it would be backed by gold
Market *
Yeah inflation should be below 0
not 2%
Here are some of the myths if you’d like
About the expansion of an economy
It wasn’t what restricted the economy in 1800s
It expanded fast
It’s an audio but
But negative inflation incentivises money hoarding instead of investment
It becomes more and more profitable to hold money than to spend, invest, or use it productively
Wrong
Oh hey
fuck i cant post ss