Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Discord ID: 533778422388752385


2019-01-12 22:37:43 UTC  

That’s a myth itself

2019-01-12 22:37:47 UTC  

Like I said, if we avoid discussion about central banking for a minute, I think gold-backed currency has problems that you could agree on.

2019-01-12 22:38:19 UTC  

As in, most of the later 1800s, there was a rising demand for currency coupled with a constant supply that squeezed creditors and restrained the economy.

2019-01-12 22:39:20 UTC  

Plus, new gold discoveries can cause inflation too.

2019-01-12 22:39:38 UTC  

And if someone tried to corner the market on gold, that could cause a huge problem for the money supply.

2019-01-12 22:39:52 UTC  

Not to mention that gold is just hard to use and move around.

2019-01-12 22:41:03 UTC  

A non-inflationary, central-bank-less fiat would be likely better.

2019-01-12 22:42:05 UTC  

See hays the problem , with FIAT currencies, it has no value. The only reason it’s used is because the state gives its value. Increases in money supply causes inflation for this. However for gold, a higher gold supply would increase the supply for money but would not cause inflation as it is is backed by some incentric value.

1800s did not have restrained growth? It was a rapid expansion.


We can’t have a central bank less, non inflationary FIAT . It is impossible

2019-01-12 22:42:12 UTC  

The problem about moving gold around is hardly a problem

2019-01-12 22:42:51 UTC  

How is it impossible?

2019-01-12 22:43:13 UTC  

If there's a private business contracted by the government to keep inflation at 0% by issuing currency strictly to meet demand

2019-01-12 22:43:47 UTC  

Which is impossible as central planning will fail

2019-01-12 22:43:50 UTC  

And 1800s were a time of expansion, which drove the money shortage and the rise in debt burden for much of the country.

2019-01-12 22:43:53 UTC  

As we’ve seen with the GED

2019-01-12 22:43:55 UTC  

How is that impossible?

2019-01-12 22:43:56 UTC  

FED

2019-01-12 22:44:02 UTC  

because central planning fails

2019-01-12 22:44:33 UTC  

But it's incredibly minimal central planning, if it can even be called that

2019-01-12 22:44:48 UTC  

It's not like the current Fed can't keep inflation around 2%

2019-01-12 22:44:50 UTC  

The government controlling the money supply is strictly central planning

2019-01-12 22:44:53 UTC  

it can’t

2019-01-12 22:44:56 UTC  

because it isn’t

2019-01-12 22:44:58 UTC  

The business would control the money supply

2019-01-12 22:45:03 UTC  

And it’s not supposed to keep it around 2%

2019-01-12 22:45:14 UTC  

The fed's target rn is 2%

2019-01-12 22:45:31 UTC  

if the businesses controlled money supply it would be backed by gold

2019-01-12 22:45:34 UTC  

Market *

2019-01-12 22:45:42 UTC  

Yeah inflation should be below 0

2019-01-12 22:45:47 UTC  

not 2%

2019-01-12 22:46:22 UTC  

Here are some of the myths if you’d like

2019-01-12 22:46:28 UTC  

About the expansion of an economy

2019-01-12 22:46:36 UTC  

It wasn’t what restricted the economy in 1800s

2019-01-12 22:46:39 UTC  

It expanded fast

2019-01-12 22:46:47 UTC  

It’s an audio but

2019-01-12 22:46:56 UTC  

But negative inflation incentivises money hoarding instead of investment

2019-01-12 22:47:02 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418667927169138688/533778964011941891/inflation-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990.png

2019-01-12 22:47:36 UTC  

It becomes more and more profitable to hold money than to spend, invest, or use it productively

2019-01-12 22:47:38 UTC  

Wrong

2019-01-12 22:47:47 UTC  

Oh hey

2019-01-12 22:47:47 UTC  

fuck i cant post ss