And when I define something or someone as extreme, I’m thinking about them or that as something that could potentially support the complete destruction of the other side

I would use extremism to categorize hitler’s and Stalin’s ideals

Not trumps

potentially..

this level of uncertainty makes it wrong to equate extremism with evil I think

I think it’s fair to be able to relate them

Because evil in itself is full of extreme actions

Therefore saying something is extreme definitely can be seen as evil.

hmm

I wouldn’t say equate

Just they associate with each other

Like ketchup and mustard

If that makes sense

@no sam semaj @Jonchez

debate me on economics

idc about economics lol

@no sam semaj What do you believe in then

just some issues

corporatism

How do you define corporatism

>doesn't know what corporatism is

I know what it is

>"debate me on economics"

just people have different defintions

corporatism is reactionary to socialism and capitalism so it would depend on your definitions for both of those

I define socialism as the MoP owned by the workers or state
Capitalism is an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined by competition in a free market.

"free market"

yes

hmmm

Mhm?

what does he mean by this

I mean a market with no state intervention, just market forces

are you talking a true free market or what?

yes

this doesn't exist anywhere?

Correct

atleast you're consistent

like I said, I don't really care all that much about economics, I'm a national socialist. I see it as a tool to serve the people, not the people as a tool to serve the economy

There is no "the economy"

we are the economy

it's not a seperate entity