Who are not, you know. American citizens.

Based on religion.

Which goes against the principles of your constitution.

Except the Constitution doesn't apply to foreign nationals.

It applies to American citizens.

This is the point of sovereignty.

It does by principle apply to everyone.

Just not by law.

You don't seem to be very familiar with our Constitution.

Are the rights god given?

Yes or no?

We recognize them as such, under the Constitution, applying to citizens of the sovereign entity that is the United States of America. Outside of those parameters, the discussion is philosophical at best.

You're taking very long to answer a simple yes or no question

Ok, so the answer is yes.

So by principle the constitution should apply to everyone

No, of course not.

Because we're not in charge of the entire world.

And banning people from entering the country because they have a certain religion goes against its principles

I said by principle

Yeah, that's what I mean.

We don't owe the citizens of another country anything.

In reality they don't, because America isn't in charge of the whole world.

Including guaranteed admission.

However by the principles of the constitution everyone should have these rights.

The same way that France doesn't owe me anything.

Or Japan.

And restriction religious freedom for anyone, regardless of nationality, goes against the principles of your constitution.

I'm not extended any rights or protections under Japanese law that protects its citizens

Because I'm not a Japanese national.

I'm not arguing by law.

I'm not understanding what difficulty you're having with the concept of sovereignty.

By law you are right.

America doesn't own the world, so American laws don't apply to everyone yes.

I agree with that statement.

And as Americans, it's our play in determining who gets in and who doesn't.

However, your constitution calls some rights god given, inalienable etc. Meaning that by PRINCIPLE, they SHOULD be rewarded to everyone, even though by law this is not the case.

So it is unconstitutional by PRINCIPLE to limit the religious freedom of people, regardless of nationality.

Except we're not limiting their religious freedom.

You are.

They can practice it all they want, exactly where they are.

You are limiting their religious freedom because they would be able to immigrate if they stopped practicing, you are discriminating against them on the basis of religion and restricting their ability to immigrate to your country based solely on religion.