It's been a long time

😂

Yas

I was here yesterday though 🤔

Well shit I missed it, time zone differences

Yup

Benefit of staying up til 12 am

It was 9pm ish my time... So 12 hours ago

And I went to bed at 0300 😂

Jesus

Well... *Sleep...
I was in bed long before then

Distractions and allergies

I know what you mean, a couple nights ago I just couldn't sleep no matter how hard I tried

so, I take it nobody here is an autocratic monarchy fan? a nobility classissist fan?

Ended up sleeping at like 6 pm

@Diokun not that I know of, maybe 1 or 2 inactive guys lmao

Keep in mind for most people here it's like 3 am

ok

autocracy bro?

100%

absolute monarchy, or other form of 1 man-rule

Seems I was mistaken

@Nikitis Look at the numbers. How many rich people are there and how rich are they? They cannot carry the poor. Thinking that is retarded and shows some sadistic socialistic tendencies... Robin Hood isn't the solution, education is.

I like bureaucratic monarchy like 19th century autocracy style

law is bad (seriously). will of man is better. law is interpreted. which means it doesn't exist really.

@Donaldus Triumphus same... Sleep is racist I guess<:GWfroggyBlobWokeThink:398570327942365195>

if something interpretable isn't really in existence then nothing is, that's a steep slope down to solipsism

fucking sleep, invading our country

From the beginning of the U.S., there was some recognition that government should be concerned about the dangers of powerful corporations, but the existence of a corporation is an act of government, and regulation of business is always done with the best interests of business in mind. Historically, when a regulatory agency is formed, the regulated industry manages to control it.

If government could be separated from the interests of the propertied class, and could grant primacy to the living people, it would no longer “govern” in the sense that we have known. Communication, education, and the protection of privacy would be its most important functions. Instead of prosecuting Aaron Swartz for liberating information from JSTOR, government would prevent the privatization of things that are properly public property. It would prevent the creation and enforcement of myths that make illegitimate power possible.

“The growing wealth aquired by them [corporations] never fails to be a source of abuses.”
 –President James Madison

Lol,

Divine law exists and its absolute. man law doesn't exist. it is a fantasy. that is why the rule of man is not only better, but the only thing that actually exist. even in a "law" country

yeah I'm on board with laws, I like having a constitution, but it is meaningless without good men as rulers

divine right to rule worked well, I hope it isn't obsolete now

divine law exists and is absolute if you accept the existence of external divinity, which I would say many don't

its sad that even the "white hats" are in favor of the rule of law (aka constitution and checks and balances)

It is worrisome how incompatible modern population is becoming with traditionalist systems

well, without religion you can't really have a good country. so trying to form a country with the agreement of those people seems like either a waste of time, or a failure

@Deleted User exactly!

@Nikitis Quotes are meaningless fluff without context. And government cannot be separated from stuff like that if politicians are rich people or celebrities.

Government needs to return to what it was. A volunteer job of service to community. Meant only to pool resources for maintenance and keeping crime to a minimum.

Well I'll be heading off for the night, you gents enjoy your discussion. I will read it tomorrow morning

@Deleted User that happens with a lot of traditionalist systems. They become outdated and are exposed for flaws, so it gets improved.