he is potentially a very serious threat

It's sort of hard to know

By both wyas

*ways

stop confusing yourself

It is true

They have to look at their criminal record

what the hell do you think you're talking about

stop using pronouns so I can understand how you have managed to become confused

Ok

In order to securely vet them, they have to look at their criminal records

you're still only using ambiguous pronouns but I can maybe tell what you think you're talking about

**an illegal with an expired visa has been vetted by our government and will likely have stable employment and/or family here
he is not a serious threat
and illegal entrant however has never been vetted and is not tracable by any government agency
he is potentially a very serious threat**

reread this more carefully

I was explaining that it is much more important to keep illegal entrants out than to deport visa overstays

Ok

and illegal entrants almost always enter by land or sea

rarely by air

are we done now, do you get it

40% of migrants enter by air

jesus christ

Later on, it says "40% might be too low"

On the politifact page

you are very stubborn and retarded which is a bad combination, but do you want to hear about the other ways that you're wrong?

Ok

Illegal immigrant statistics only attempt to measure the number of illegals in the country. Your figures that say illegal immigration is declining only capture this figure, and do not tell you about the increased border crossings *in both directions*

illegal immigrants follow a pattern of crossing back and forth regularly, making our border with Mexico extremely porous and vulnerable to criminal activity

Further, illegal immigration data is by its nature nebulous, which means that every interpretation of that spotty data has had its holes filled in by guesswork, and in every case by bias or wishful thinking as well.

By these two forces combined, illegal immigration statistics from any source are so unreliable that it is foolish to base any theory or policy off of them

If there is a certain trend in the data, then it means its based on some accuracy

that is wrong and betrays your complete misunderstanding of data error

any change that is within the margin of error must not be considered a trend

Wouldn’t the numbers be jumping up and down if it was completly wrong?

no.

There wouldnt be a trend

data collection can be precise and innaccurate

you would benefit from a formal stats course

I'm sure you would find it interesting to learn how your magic numbers come to be

The data has a 90% confidence interval

That's low

True