Message from @Anon365
Discord ID: 526493886885920778
not nearly the same
There are international flights all the time
an illegal with an expired visa has been vetted by our government and will likely have stable employment and/or family here
he is not a serious threat
and illegal entrant however has never been vetted and is not tracable by any government agency
he is potentially a very serious threat
It's sort of hard to know
By both wyas
*ways
stop confusing yourself
It is true
They have to look at their criminal record
what the hell do you think you're talking about
stop using pronouns so I can understand how you have managed to become confused
Ok
In order to securely vet them, they have to look at their criminal records
you're still only using ambiguous pronouns but I can maybe tell what you think you're talking about
**an illegal with an expired visa has been vetted by our government and will likely have stable employment and/or family here
he is not a serious threat
and illegal entrant however has never been vetted and is not tracable by any government agency
he is potentially a very serious threat**
reread this more carefully
I was explaining that it is much more important to keep illegal entrants out than to deport visa overstays
and illegal entrants almost always enter by land or sea
rarely by air
are we done now, do you get it
40% of migrants enter by air
jesus christ
Later on, it says "40% might be too low"
On the politifact page
you are very stubborn and retarded which is a bad combination, but do you want to hear about the other ways that you're wrong?
Ok
Illegal immigrant statistics only attempt to measure the number of illegals in the country. Your figures that say illegal immigration is declining only capture this figure, and do not tell you about the increased border crossings *in both directions*
illegal immigrants follow a pattern of crossing back and forth regularly, making our border with Mexico extremely porous and vulnerable to criminal activity
Further, illegal immigration data is by its nature nebulous, which means that every interpretation of that spotty data has had its holes filled in by guesswork, and in every case by bias or wishful thinking as well.
By these two forces combined, illegal immigration statistics from any source are so unreliable that it is foolish to base any theory or policy off of them
If there is a certain trend in the data, then it means its based on some accuracy
that is wrong and betrays your complete misunderstanding of data error
any change that is within the margin of error must not be considered a trend
Wouldn’t the numbers be jumping up and down if it was completly wrong?
no.
There wouldnt be a trend
data collection can be precise and innaccurate