Yes the whole premise of NAP is that they would follow the rule of self defence, continue in a sec i have to go to the toilet

okay

im back

so

The whole principle of self defence is literally an answer to your question. Do not attack, and only use self defence. A nuke is not a self defence weapon. It is a weapon made for specifically attacking someone. Thus an ancap society would not need that. However, that comes into the question for me at least. I am not for that, the abolishment of the nukes. It is a hard question, but i would not abolish them. The one that is advanced the most should be able to get them.

But another question forms within that

what makse you think that those nuclear bombs won't get into the hands of evil people. And i just direct that question towards the gov. A person who is evil could get elected. AAnd get a hold of nukes Same thing.

Honestly I don’t like them in the hands of anyone

^

But its a lot more comforting when they are only in the hands of a few people

Comforting? Probably. But it is the same principle. Those few people could go tyrannical just like those few companies could. However that specifically is very unlikely to happen

Tyrannical with the nukes was the better wording

What I’ve been trying to get at is that force doesn’t really fall under economics so its not just so simple as to privatize it.

It doesn’t concern production/trade

But rather destruction/seizure

Even if its destroying destruction

Its still not producing anything

where does the gov mostly get their money from

Taxation

and is taxation forced upon people

It is if you want the services the government provides

Yes but that doesn't matter it is still theft. If it uses force and says, you gett this and this and this and you must pay it even if you do not need it, it is theft. For example, they waste their tax money on useless shit like planned parenthood etc

or healthcare

obamacare a prime example

a reason trump won in the first place is that people were sick of it and were betrayed

also

my point is that what you said that force does not produce anything is false

Well thats a different story

You can have minarchism (minimalism? I forget the exact name.)

minarchism is a joke

they say the same shit we say

they say taxation is theft, that gov is dangerous etc

I know

but then still want the gov to tax people

Well they believe the government should provide military defense

That seems to be a major difference

sure

but then comes the question of the monopoly on force

they say that it is true

however they somehow support it??

idk their party is a joke just like anarcho