Message from @ventuz
Discord ID: 528275006220664832
you can#
but it would not matter as much
most of them would focus on their technological advancement and their training skiklls
Which brings up the question of nukes
what about it
Could it not quickly turn into a nuclear arms race?
no
how would it turn into that
Improved technology and weapons seems to point to weapons of mass distruction
No?
yes
and
a country with an ancap system would follow NAP-non aggression principle
a nuclear weapon is usually used for attacking something right?
Ya
Yes the whole premise of NAP is that they would follow the rule of self defence, continue in a sec i have to go to the toilet
okay
im back
so
The whole principle of self defence is literally an answer to your question. Do not attack, and only use self defence. A nuke is not a self defence weapon. It is a weapon made for specifically attacking someone. Thus an ancap society would not need that. However, that comes into the question for me at least. I am not for that, the abolishment of the nukes. It is a hard question, but i would not abolish them. The one that is advanced the most should be able to get them.
what makse you think that those nuclear bombs won't get into the hands of evil people. And i just direct that question towards the gov. A person who is evil could get elected. AAnd get a hold of nukes Same thing.
Honestly I don’t like them in the hands of anyone
^
But its a lot more comforting when they are only in the hands of a few people
Comforting? Probably. But it is the same principle. Those few people could go tyrannical just like those few companies could. However that specifically is very unlikely to happen
Tyrannical with the nukes was the better wording
What I’ve been trying to get at is that force doesn’t really fall under economics so its not just so simple as to privatize it.
It doesn’t concern production/trade
But rather destruction/seizure
Even if its destroying destruction
Its still not producing anything
where does the gov mostly get their money from
Taxation
and is taxation forced upon people
It is if you want the services the government provides
Yes but that doesn't matter it is still theft. If it uses force and says, you gett this and this and this and you must pay it even if you do not need it, it is theft. For example, they waste their tax money on useless shit like planned parenthood etc
or healthcare
obamacare a prime example
a reason trump won in the first place is that people were sick of it and were betrayed
also