Message from @twomoo1119

Discord ID: 528273376104415253


2018-12-28 18:00:47 UTC  

as much

2018-12-28 18:01:21 UTC  

whats the point of having an army of 5 million people who have no training skills and your company being shit technologically

2018-12-28 18:01:33 UTC  

Well you can be both, right?

2018-12-28 18:01:39 UTC  

Large and technologically advanced

2018-12-28 18:01:44 UTC  

they would have to allocate their resources intelligently

2018-12-28 18:01:46 UTC  

yes

2018-12-28 18:01:47 UTC  

you can#

2018-12-28 18:01:52 UTC  

but it would not matter as much

2018-12-28 18:02:29 UTC  

most of them would focus on their technological advancement and their training skiklls

2018-12-28 18:03:45 UTC  

Which brings up the question of nukes

2018-12-28 18:04:49 UTC  

what about it

2018-12-28 18:05:02 UTC  

Could it not quickly turn into a nuclear arms race?

2018-12-28 18:07:03 UTC  

no

2018-12-28 18:07:07 UTC  

how would it turn into that

2018-12-28 18:07:51 UTC  

Improved technology and weapons seems to point to weapons of mass distruction

2018-12-28 18:07:53 UTC  

No?

2018-12-28 18:08:02 UTC  

yes

2018-12-28 18:08:05 UTC  

and

2018-12-28 18:09:17 UTC  

a country with an ancap system would follow NAP-non aggression principle

2018-12-28 18:09:40 UTC  

a nuclear weapon is usually used for attacking something right?

2018-12-28 18:09:47 UTC  

Ya

2018-12-28 18:10:17 UTC  

Yes the whole premise of NAP is that they would follow the rule of self defence, continue in a sec i have to go to the toilet

2018-12-28 18:14:16 UTC  

okay

2018-12-28 18:14:18 UTC  

im back

2018-12-28 18:14:19 UTC  

so

2018-12-28 18:16:06 UTC  

The whole principle of self defence is literally an answer to your question. Do not attack, and only use self defence. A nuke is not a self defence weapon. It is a weapon made for specifically attacking someone. Thus an ancap society would not need that. However, that comes into the question for me at least. I am not for that, the abolishment of the nukes. It is a hard question, but i would not abolish them. The one that is advanced the most should be able to get them.

2018-12-28 18:16:16 UTC  

But another question forms within that

2018-12-28 18:16:57 UTC  

what makse you think that those nuclear bombs won't get into the hands of evil people. And i just direct that question towards the gov. A person who is evil could get elected. AAnd get a hold of nukes Same thing.

2018-12-28 18:17:35 UTC  

Honestly I don’t like them in the hands of anyone

2018-12-28 18:17:41 UTC  

^

2018-12-28 18:18:00 UTC  

But its a lot more comforting when they are only in the hands of a few people

2018-12-28 18:18:53 UTC  

Comforting? Probably. But it is the same principle. Those few people could go tyrannical just like those few companies could. However that specifically is very unlikely to happen

2018-12-28 18:19:58 UTC  

Tyrannical with the nukes was the better wording

2018-12-28 18:23:22 UTC  

What I’ve been trying to get at is that force doesn’t really fall under economics so its not just so simple as to privatize it.

2018-12-28 18:23:34 UTC  

It doesn’t concern production/trade

2018-12-28 18:23:52 UTC  

But rather destruction/seizure

2018-12-28 18:24:12 UTC  

Even if its destroying destruction

2018-12-28 18:24:19 UTC  

Its still not producing anything

2018-12-28 18:24:53 UTC  

where does the gov mostly get their money from

2018-12-28 18:25:23 UTC  

Taxation

2018-12-28 18:25:31 UTC  

and is taxation forced upon people