That's not fair

I explained the full idea that I was trying to express

because you did not clarify, you tried to clarify

am I not allowed to recover with an explanation?

But I did clarify

How did I not clarify?

"making someone cry isn't harassment" and "causing another person to cry in fear is harassment" are not contradictory to you?

you have said both

What is the point that is trying to be made

Its not making someone cry alone that's harassment. I failed to mention the intent.

The second statement is my actual point

And seriously, I used crying as an example

there we go 😃 intent to cause fear then?

OH

You think I believe the law literally has a claus about tears??

God no

nah I do not

Okay then I'm confused.

about what?

"causing another person to cry in fear is harassment"

I added "in fear" we're talking about intent. Isn't that the clarification you were looking for?

And why wasn't it good enough?

It's like you're arguing wtih me about a point I'm not making

If you actually hear me, then you'll know what I'm saying.

Making someone cry can happen without bullying

Or fear

Agreed

dude, I have no idea what point you're making because you can't decide if causing someone to cry is harassment or not, until recently when you redefined it to mean: intending to cause fear or harm

That's why I clarified what I meant

Can't decide?

I said it once and immediately clarified

YOU wouldn't let my first sentence go

actually you didn't until you said "I failed to mention the intent."

You refused to accept my clarification

I DID when I brought up the fucking intent

You can make someone cry without fear or bullying. You could have said something nice or inspirational, or something that was sad.

but I am not confused now

Yes Srowder, I made that point above

If you walk up to a 10 year old girl and start screaming at her and insulting her and she starts crying then that is bad

no shit

in some cultures that's actually a pretty baller move

And if you continue to harass her, that is a crime