Message from @wahx

Discord ID: 545076935592771625


2019-02-13 02:58:10 UTC  

We can't have a discussion if someone is directly contradicting themselves on the core point

2019-02-13 02:58:11 UTC  

Be careful Srowder. If you lack full clarification in one of your statements, you cannot clarify later. YOu will be held accountable for the short statement for the duration of the conversation.

2019-02-13 02:58:36 UTC  

whether or not causing someone to cry is harassment, regardless of situation, is a very important thing to figure out if we're talking about harassment

2019-02-13 02:58:37 UTC  

What did i not clarify so i can fix it

2019-02-13 02:58:53 UTC  

It doesn't matter. It won't work D=

2019-02-13 02:59:07 UTC  

no you're being clear Srowder

2019-02-13 02:59:24 UTC  

sorry man but if you just say the opposite of what you just said about the core point of a debate you're gonna confuse people

2019-02-13 02:59:31 UTC  

What am i not being clear on so i can clarify it.

2019-02-13 02:59:41 UTC  

You're not, you're fine

2019-02-13 02:59:48 UTC  

Wahx is trying to jab at me

2019-02-13 02:59:50 UTC  

lmao now you've confused srowder

2019-02-13 02:59:59 UTC  

Both of you have

2019-02-13 03:00:23 UTC  

Wahx, you asked me to clarify my point. I did, but why do you still hold the original point against me?

2019-02-13 03:00:25 UTC  

That's not fair

2019-02-13 03:00:31 UTC  

I explained the full idea that I was trying to express

2019-02-13 03:00:38 UTC  

because you did not clarify, you tried to clarify

2019-02-13 03:00:39 UTC  

am I not allowed to recover with an explanation?

2019-02-13 03:00:45 UTC  

But I did clarify

2019-02-13 03:00:49 UTC  

How did I not clarify?

2019-02-13 03:00:54 UTC  

"making someone cry isn't harassment" and "causing another person to cry in fear is harassment" are not contradictory to you?

2019-02-13 03:01:08 UTC  

you have said both

2019-02-13 03:01:12 UTC  

What is the point that is trying to be made

2019-02-13 03:01:14 UTC  

Its not making someone cry alone that's harassment. I failed to mention the intent.

2019-02-13 03:01:22 UTC  

The second statement is my actual point

2019-02-13 03:01:29 UTC  

And seriously, I used crying as an example

2019-02-13 03:01:31 UTC  

there we go 😃 intent to cause fear then?

2019-02-13 03:01:38 UTC  

OH

2019-02-13 03:01:47 UTC  

You think I believe the law literally has a claus about tears??

2019-02-13 03:01:53 UTC  

God no

2019-02-13 03:01:53 UTC  

nah I do not

2019-02-13 03:01:59 UTC  

Okay then I'm confused.

2019-02-13 03:02:14 UTC  

about what?

2019-02-13 03:02:31 UTC  

"causing another person to cry in fear is harassment"

I added "in fear" we're talking about intent. Isn't that the clarification you were looking for?

2019-02-13 03:02:33 UTC  

And why wasn't it good enough?

2019-02-13 03:02:41 UTC  

It's like you're arguing wtih me about a point I'm not making

2019-02-13 03:02:47 UTC  

If you actually hear me, then you'll know what I'm saying.

2019-02-13 03:03:05 UTC  

Making someone cry can happen without bullying

2019-02-13 03:03:09 UTC  

Or fear

2019-02-13 03:03:13 UTC  

Agreed

2019-02-13 03:03:14 UTC  

dude, I have no idea what point you're making because you can't decide if causing someone to cry is harassment or not, until recently when you redefined it to mean: intending to cause fear or harm

2019-02-13 03:03:20 UTC  

That's why I clarified what I meant