Message from @allhailthebowl
Discord ID: 549389587219349506
what did they ever do to you?
collectively their ilk has got us to where we are at
how so?
the comfortable white masses don't gaf
and what's your plan to fix that?
make them suffer
how
it's just our first date
I can't give you the full chonga
inb4 reed seej
but the people are reading it
even your favorite anime
post ur best siegies
I'm a collector
I don't have any
Just the fish
shutup retard
I'd prefer not to have my images flooded with anime characters reading siege
thats because you got the gay
wrong
you should get that looked at by a professional
CNN is fake as fuck
woah you are woke
@Anon365 that may be true, but control does not tell the whole story. Gun ownership vs MURDER RATE is better. I don’t care about gun deaths, it includes suicides and justified shootings etc, what matters is murder rate
@Leo (BillNyeLand) Same here
If we compare murder rate and gun ownership by state
There is no correlation between gun ownership and murder rate
But there are examples like Kennsaw. In 1982, there was a mandate requiring almost every household to own a gun. Ever since then there has never been over 15 murders and crime there has been declining since. Other examples are the safest cities in the US are the ones in “gun nut zones “
Like Lincoln, Chandler and Plano
The idea I was going off of is that gun ownership usually tells you how many “good guys” (law-abiding citizens) have guns, while the strictness of gun laws has more of an impact on how many “bad guys” (criminals) have them. The ideal situation is that criminals have no guys and normal people have sufficient guns. I just think that, in general, gun control helps make that balance more favorable than no gun laws at all (although that depends highly on the type of gun legislation and subsequently I do oppose certain restrictions)
Gun control does the opposite
It restricts “good guys” as they’re the only people that follow the laws