Message from @Deejay from Earth

Discord ID: 477098537037856778


2018-08-09 12:37:46 UTC  

would not

2018-08-09 12:38:34 UTC  

3-4 years is still 3-4x how long it will take in todays yachts so it doesn't really add any merit

2018-08-09 12:40:16 UTC  

69k miles @ 6mph = 11500hours, divided by 24hr a day = 479 days/ 365days =1.3 years

2018-08-09 12:40:45 UTC  

that's conservatively

2018-08-09 12:41:08 UTC  

vs 102 days on a GE

2018-08-09 12:41:30 UTC  

<:Hmm3:469473862619496449>

2018-08-09 12:43:01 UTC  

Good thing the stars have been the same year-on-year since the beginning of time. Otherwise nobody could possibly navigate by the stars if they kept changing all the time.

2018-08-09 12:47:34 UTC  

Yeah I am also glad the rotation of the earth and its axis as we move through the universe together with our solar system and adjacent systems is constant

2018-08-09 12:48:00 UTC  

@MR VLAK Which you can't prove..

2018-08-09 12:48:26 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/469490581899575297/477095815152926721/DOBz2FnW4AEzGPC.jpg

2018-08-09 12:49:54 UTC  

the dopper effect. Light is waves, sound is waves.. easy to grasp

2018-08-09 12:50:07 UTC  

Yeah radar only works on a flat plane.

2018-08-09 12:50:33 UTC  

What does your article prove and how does it prove it?

2018-08-09 12:52:20 UTC  

The Doppler Effect Proves A Flat Earth: Something To Think About Before I Stream This Saturday
Ignore X
The cute picture above gives a basic example of what the doppler effect is: as a sound approaches a stationary listener the pitch of the sound is higher. As the sound passes the observer and moves away, the pitch of the sound becomes lower. You've probably heard this if you have ever stood nearby an approaching train or ambulance.

Here is where it gets interesting: the doppler effect disproves the round earth. Think about it: the round earth (including the atmosphere) is supposedly spinning at 1000mph. The direction of rotation is from west to east. That means the atmosphere must be circulating with the earth from west to east. The speed of sound is 767mph. Remember: sound travels through a medium (in our case, air) and cannot travel where there is no material to move through. So the earth and you are each moving at the breakneck speed of 1000mph. Imagine you are standing facing west and someone half a mile away lights a firecracker. If the earth is really spinning at 1000mph, and sound only moves through the atmosphere at 767mph, you would NEVER be able to hear the sound of the firecracker exploding. The sound would never catch up with you. When you see a lightening strike in the west, you should never be able to hear thunder if the earth is round and spinning as spherists claim.

This shows that the earth really is Flat. I encourage you to put on your proverbial caps and think away. The earth is NOT round. I will be streaming live this Saturday at 8pm eastern time. My twitch channel is here, tune in and let me know what you come up with regarding the this "doppler dilemma". Or any other Flat earth question. When you open your mind, you will find that Planar Theory kicks ball belief every time...

2018-08-09 12:52:27 UTC  

It explains how wave frequency changes depending on if a object moving to or away your viewing point.

2018-08-09 12:54:15 UTC  

that extract of your is meaningless and assumes that everything contained in the earth atmosphere is not a closed system. Remember the fly in the car example?

2018-08-09 12:54:41 UTC  

Doppler effect proves that the stars and we are moving through the universe.

2018-08-09 12:56:12 UTC  

@MR VLAK It's stationary until you can prove otherwise. Your entire model is based on an unproven assumption.

2018-08-09 12:56:29 UTC  

If FLat Earthers believe in the doppler effect, then they should believe that the starts are moving based on the same logic

2018-08-09 12:59:15 UTC  

@MR VLAK You can only reason and deduce logically if you start from a proven base-foundation - which you don't have. So you may call it "logic" but it's not really that, because I can reverse engineer every single one of your claims back to it's root where every single one of them will fall apart.

2018-08-09 13:00:01 UTC  

This is what building your foundation on a rock is all about.

2018-08-09 13:02:04 UTC  

That's what's interesting about your logic. You start from a proven base and when it doesn't match your agenda you turn to another direction. I have shown it in our discussion multiple times.

2018-08-09 13:03:41 UTC  

I have come to the conclusion you are in to deep and by accepting even the slightest possibility of anything else would be in too much of a conflict of your beliefs.

2018-08-09 13:03:54 UTC  

@MR VLAK You have only linked articles that triggers your confirmation bias. You have not proved anything. Flat Earth is a huge field and there's lots of avenues that can be debated until the cows come home, but ultimately doesn't prove anything either way.

2018-08-09 13:04:37 UTC  

If that is so why do you not accept that you can be right and wrong?

2018-08-09 13:04:38 UTC  

Stick to what we can prove. You will not convince me logically I guarantee you that.

2018-08-09 13:06:10 UTC  

@MR VLAK I know for a fact it's flat and stationary - all the science is there. All the logic is there. I'm not here trying to figure out what shape it is.

2018-08-09 13:08:48 UTC  

Why would we be conditioned to believe a round earth?

2018-08-09 13:10:40 UTC  

@MR VLAK Because you don't teach your slave gangs how to make guns and gunpowder. Smart people can't be controlled so easy.

2018-08-09 13:11:28 UTC  

Being a product of the system makes you believe in the system too. People will even defend it.

2018-08-09 13:15:03 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/469490581899575297/477102512940384256/kek.png

2018-08-09 13:15:34 UTC  

Just to point out something, vlak has a good point though, you can't accept that you might be wrong, which is problematic... All the same rhetoric applies to you too DeeJay, you too could be taught incorrectly with regards to an agenda, and you too are essentially a product of a system that you believe in and even defend... The measure here is that you both are equal, so unless you don't accept the golden rule, and treat one another as equal, you will never get anywhere in terms of being able to reason.

2018-08-09 13:16:02 UTC  

Flat earthers you just jump off the edge tbh

2018-08-09 13:16:27 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/469490581899575297/477102866658492417/DCXi9dyW0AAs17t.jpg

2018-08-09 13:19:10 UTC  

the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioural decisions and attitude change.

Lol this applies to you equally too hey

2018-08-09 13:19:59 UTC  

Gravity... Once you understand this, then everything else you understand will be questioned

2018-08-09 13:20:54 UTC  

@Sheamus I don't agree with much of anything you said there. This is not about the art of the debate. This is about what we can prove. It's all about the science. Why is it then that only the flerfer has to prove his model and not the globulist? Why should I see the other party as an equal when right from the get-go I am not being treated as such? I have not seen ONE globe proof even worth considering.

2018-08-09 13:21:37 UTC  

Brian Cox is a nothing but a pseudo-intellectual and a fraud.

2018-08-09 13:22:43 UTC  

lol