So "The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time. The total entropy can remain constant in ideal cases where the system is in a steady state (equilibrium), or is undergoing a reversible process."

how does this relate to the solar system in your opinion?

187) The second law of thermodynamics, otherwise known as the law of entropy, along with the fundamental principles of friction/resistance determine the impossibility of Earth being a uniformly spinning ball. Over time, the spinning ball Earth would experience measurable amounts of drag constantly slowing the spin and lengthening the amount of hours per day. As not the slightest such change has ever been observed in all of recorded history it is absurd to assume the Earth has ever moved an inch.

Law of entropy - everything degrades over time.

you noted the lack of drag when objects fell in a vacuum right?

Could you please refer me to the scientific journal where your WOOD ruler experiment was published for peer-review?

@MR VLAK And where are you located btw? I'm up for going to the dam this coming weekend or the next if you would like? Who wants to join us?

@Deejay from Earth I am in Kzn

That's cool I'll drive through if you can suggest a six mile stretch of water anywhere nearby?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophi%C3%A6_Naturalis_Principia_Mathematica

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment

@MR VLAK Oh it's much better to see the evidence for yourself, first hand. I don't mind the drive - I drive a lot anyways. What dams are there in KZN?

i could not share all the sources as Discord has a text limit

What dam is closest to you?

i will check on google earth for 3-6km line of sight

Cool.

Jozini seem the most sensible

@MR VLAK Why has Cavendish never been repeated and why isn't there one of these alleged devices in every classroom?

@MR VLAK Why isn't there a gyroscope to prove and experiment with the spin of the earth in every classroom?

@MR VLAK Why isn't there even a basic telescope in every science classroom?

because they can do it with a lader, ruler and a few masses

And I am now done with you selectively answering my questions.

Telescope and Gyroscope i cannot answer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11sLusnVZwM

its the cavendish experiment... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_Transactions_of_the_Royal_Society

Cavendish, H. 'Experiments to determine the Density of the Earth', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (part II) 88 p.469-526 (21 June 1798), reprinted in Cavendish 1798

No that is a book.

what peer review happened in 17th century lets be honest

How about the last 100 or so years ago? Repeated and published?

I don't think scientists spend much time on items they learn in school and can repeat anytime they have a ladder, some string, ruler and weights. But I am speculating here

Also your entire model is still based on the assumption that the earth rotates. That still hasen't changed, regardless of how many links you post. You are wasting time with BS Strawman arguments and vague irrelevant bullshit.

no my model is based on the fact that masses are pulled to each other, this explains gravity and why solar objects orbit. Then gravity explains how water can be around a sphere

Then demonstrate how gravity sticks around a ball WITH AN EXPERIMENT.

proving the earth moves is irrelevant to me in proving the earth is a sphere

Ah yes. Proving the base foundation which you need to make your model work is irrelevant. Right. Got that. Thanks.

If I can make a ball with a mass large enough i would show you. I need to break the earth gravitational force first to show you

Gravity does not require the earth to rotate... the experiment is no-rotating objects... get that, thanks

Don't forget to make it spin at Mach 1.3

Why doesn't the moon have little mini-moons orbiting it?

@MR VLAK What is the correct curvature formula I should use to calculate how much curvature there should be?