Message from @MR VLAK
Discord ID: 477145197105643520
here is a experiment you can do https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_qreV5A4gA
Please explain the details of how this experiment works, what it proves and how I should replicate it. I don't understand what is happening there at all. Thanks.
No worries. a ruler is hung from a ladder at its centre with two identical masses on either side to balance it. Two larger objects (masses) are placed evenly spaced from the masses on the ruler on opposite sides till it is not moving. Once a equilibrium is found one can move one of the large masses away and document the movement of the ruler. What is happening is that mass on the ruler is still closest to the large mass that did not move gets pulled towards it. The counter acting gravitational force on the opposite end was moved and weakened it such that the equilibrium is broken, this makes the ruler move.
I hope I explained it sufficiently
The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a fact, when in fact it is not even a good theory.
First of all, no one has measured gravity for every atom and every star. It is simply a religious belief that it is "universal".
Secondly, school textbooks routinely make false statements. For example, "the moon goes around the earth." If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun's gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth's gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun. Anybody can look up at night and see the obvious gaps in gravity theory. https://ncse.com/library-resource/gravity-its-only-theory
dude.. the closer the object is to a mass the more the force. It is exponetial
@MR VLAK Are there any assumptions as to the alleged axial rotation in the gravitational theories?
no. it does not explain or attempt to explain rotation of planets only orbiting of planets
Furthermore, gravity theory suggests that the planets have been moving in orderly orbits for millions and millions of years, which wholly contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Ever heard of the Law of Entropy?
I hope we can get past the definitions of theories and laws in science. I am looking into your last comment, give me a moment I cant remember all the laws etc
@MR VLAK And that experiment" together with your explanation really doesn't prove anything. If you balance and counter-balance things on a floppy tape-measure of course things will re-balance itself.
Its not a floppy tape, its a wood ruler. The only thing that is moved is the large mass at one point that never touched the ruler
So "The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time. The total entropy can remain constant in ideal cases where the system is in a steady state (equilibrium), or is undergoing a reversible process."
how does this relate to the solar system in your opinion?
187) The second law of thermodynamics, otherwise known as the law of entropy, along with the fundamental principles of friction/resistance determine the impossibility of Earth being a uniformly spinning ball. Over time, the spinning ball Earth would experience measurable amounts of drag constantly slowing the spin and lengthening the amount of hours per day. As not the slightest such change has ever been observed in all of recorded history it is absurd to assume the Earth has ever moved an inch.
Law of entropy - everything degrades over time.
you noted the lack of drag when objects fell in a vacuum right?
Could you please refer me to the scientific journal where your WOOD ruler experiment was published for peer-review?
@MR VLAK And where are you located btw? I'm up for going to the dam this coming weekend or the next if you would like? Who wants to join us?
That's cool I'll drive through if you can suggest a six mile stretch of water anywhere nearby?
@MR VLAK Oh it's much better to see the evidence for yourself, first hand. I don't mind the drive - I drive a lot anyways. What dams are there in KZN?
What dam is closest to you?
i will check on google earth for 3-6km line of sight
Cool.
Jozini seem the most sensible
@MR VLAK Why has Cavendish never been repeated and why isn't there one of these alleged devices in every classroom?
@MR VLAK Why isn't there a gyroscope to prove and experiment with the spin of the earth in every classroom?
@MR VLAK Why isn't there even a basic telescope in every science classroom?
because they can do it with a lader, ruler and a few masses
And I am now done with you selectively answering my questions.
Telescope and Gyroscope i cannot answer
its the cavendish experiment... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_Transactions_of_the_Royal_Society
Cavendish, H. 'Experiments to determine the Density of the Earth', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (part II) 88 p.469-526 (21 June 1798), reprinted in Cavendish 1798
No that is a book.