Message from @Indigo

Discord ID: 521679357287071771


2018-12-10 13:20:21 UTC  

I could probably find a citation for boys being less suited to auditory learning

2018-12-10 13:20:42 UTC  

..

2018-12-10 13:20:55 UTC  

Secondly, the advantage, while substantial in impact on boys, is relatively slight. Relatively

2018-12-10 13:21:34 UTC  

It's a headline, it needs to get attention

2018-12-10 13:21:46 UTC  

Otherwise people won't click

2018-12-10 13:22:19 UTC  

it works out to boys being somewhere between 0.22 of a standard deviation behind, but that's over a large period of time, it might be smaller or larger if I were to try to find results for just the last decade

2018-12-10 13:22:22 UTC  

"what can we do about it" is a call to action and it works psychologicallly

2018-12-10 13:22:44 UTC  

I like that, and I also don't have a problem with answering "well, its complicated"

2018-12-10 13:22:56 UTC  

and then going into the details

2018-12-10 13:23:04 UTC  

thanks, I'll do that

2018-12-10 13:23:10 UTC  

That's a question I can ask. I'll use it to fix the double-question.

2018-12-10 13:23:11 UTC  

..

2018-12-10 13:23:14 UTC  

As for the title, that is harder

2018-12-10 13:23:33 UTC  

Right now my heading is simply "An Issue of Education", which on a site called menarehuman should be descriptive enough

2018-12-10 13:23:45 UTC  

But it might not be the best

2018-12-10 13:24:28 UTC  

In general practice, it's better to be more descriptive

2018-12-10 13:24:50 UTC  

Yeah, but how does one be more descriptive on what is effectively a rather broad research paper?

2018-12-10 13:26:11 UTC  

..

2018-12-10 13:26:29 UTC  

For the two of you, do you have any comments for the end of the article?

2018-12-10 13:27:08 UTC  

I could use a second opinion on that even before the middle stuff is dealt with.

2018-12-10 13:27:31 UTC  

I mean, anyway our sons being at disadvantage is the gist of the paper, right

2018-12-10 13:27:50 UTC  

I suppose I don't think so

2018-12-10 13:28:17 UTC  

The point, I think, is that they aren't fully supported (and are suffering as a result).

2018-12-10 13:29:17 UTC  

Although relative disadvantage is pretty useful when demonstrating that there is a problem, it is difficult when it comes to making the issue matter. Because relative disadvantage doesn't really matter by itself

2018-12-10 13:29:33 UTC  

But at the same time

2018-12-10 13:29:47 UTC  

I don't really have numbers, data on the real impact on boys for any of this.

2018-12-10 13:30:05 UTC  

So perhaps simply being at a disadvantage is all I can make a direct point

2018-12-10 13:30:08 UTC  

Relative disadvantage would had mattered a lot if it was girls that were disadvantaged

2018-12-10 13:30:18 UTC  

Yes, yes it would

2018-12-10 13:30:59 UTC  

We can call it a disadvantage then

2018-12-10 13:31:03 UTC  

Sure

2018-12-10 13:31:40 UTC  

Sorry, I was thinking aloud, the gist of the paper probably ultimately is boys being at a disadvantage

2018-12-10 13:31:54 UTC  

I'm just slightly dissatisfied with stopping there

2018-12-10 13:32:17 UTC  

but also want to keep very grounded in evidence

2018-12-10 13:42:56 UTC  

@asparkofpyrokravte I bet it seems like it's getting ridiculously long to 'get it right'... But it's worth it mate

2018-12-10 13:43:33 UTC  

I'm sorry to have told you that it seems wrong. But you need to know

2018-12-10 13:43:56 UTC  

Buddy, I'm literally asking for it

2018-12-10 13:45:11 UTC  

Doesn't make me not feel bad about it lol. It's like, you know its wrong but dont wanna offend someone who's obviously trying hard!!

2018-12-10 13:45:55 UTC  

Your effort is so worthwhile, I can't really write it for you and please keep on :3

2018-12-10 13:46:22 UTC  

I have finished reading the article

2018-12-10 13:46:39 UTC  

The ending is very good