Message from @Men Are Human
Discord ID: 517637696236027908
but I thought I remembered there was one study that couldn't quite be explained that way
@asparkofpyrokravte this may not be exactly what you are looking for but it's close https://www.ipp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/n14-notesIPP-december2014.pdf
Oh shit, that's a really good source
Gave you a gold star for that one. 😄
If I get 5 stars can I is have a wowwipop?
XD
Only if you finish your dinner.
I no like icky vege tubbles
Eat your Broccoli or I'm getting the studded belt!
;_;
*pet pet*
If you post that on the reddit you can watch your cartoons for ten minutes. 😉
No want cartoons. Want daddy buy me fewerri
(Ferrari, for those confused)
XD
Basically?
Wait, was @Abbysol the girl
Want bwak fewerri >.<
Daddy forgets when he has had his booze
No farrari until you eat your broccoli!!!
oh shit, girl! where!
XD
*Points at @Abbysol*
also Pink is sexest, how dare you assume that girls would prefer a pink car, you are just enforcing your white heteronormative, patriarchal ways.... also I'm not a girl, I am an attack helicopter, so how dare you try to enforce your toxic masculinity on me
/Passes out
how was that?
xD
If you're an attack helicopter can I ride you XP
Sorry xD
RAPE!!! xD
omg, I'm sorry, I can't do this anymore xD
I've been tempted to buy one of those drone thingies, but I know if I did I'd probably crash it in the first ten minutes and be out a load of cash
I've seen a guy who flies one around my town, he got some really good video during the floods
lol
I'd love to get one but they are so expensive, but apparently they are really stable and easy to fly
Well I posted it, but I think there are other similar studies as well. Quite possibly better ones. For example the studies conclusion says that a significant part of the bias is caused by upmarking weaker students in math (which tends to be girls) yet the study also mentions that this accounts for 7.5% of the bias, which I wouldn't call that significant
Significant is a technical term
It basically means nontrivial
Perhaps, but where's the theory on where the rest of the unaccounted for %? It mentions also disruptive behaviour at 3.5% for instance, but there's a huge amount of 'unknown' which should lead to further theories