Message from @black person

Discord ID: 521487659970068480


2018-12-10 00:41:24 UTC  

Did it happen in the Soviet Union?

2018-12-10 00:41:28 UTC  

Did it happen in China?

2018-12-10 00:41:41 UTC  

Where are all of these people who reject it

2018-12-10 00:41:50 UTC  

Soviet philosophy btw was mad deep and they needed absolutely no god to come up with it

2018-12-10 00:42:04 UTC  

Whether it was right or wrong is not the point

2018-12-10 00:42:14 UTC  

I am bringing up two countries perceived as being atheist

2018-12-10 00:42:34 UTC  

And this occurrence was found in neither

2018-12-10 00:42:37 UTC  

and it should be considered that the Soviet philosophy had ample space for meaning

2018-12-10 00:42:47 UTC  

it was a large focus point

2018-12-10 00:43:33 UTC  

That's really debatable. They said one thing and did something completely different

2018-12-10 00:43:54 UTC  

How they acted was different from their philosophy

2018-12-10 00:44:00 UTC  

no no it was all quite consistent

2018-12-10 00:44:05 UTC  

I've read the Fundamentals for example

2018-12-10 00:44:14 UTC  

and it is a good reflection of what they were going for,

2018-12-10 00:44:16 UTC  

I don't agree

2018-12-10 00:44:18 UTC  

what they were trying to do

2018-12-10 00:44:42 UTC  

well have you read the Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism? 😋

2018-12-10 00:44:52 UTC  

does siege count

2018-12-10 00:44:59 UTC  

Lmao

2018-12-10 00:45:02 UTC  

no XD

2018-12-10 00:45:46 UTC  

based

2018-12-10 00:45:57 UTC  

"Also, what you just did Bearer was deflect @𝕭𝖊𝖆𝖗𝖊𝖗 𝖔𝖋 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝕮𝖚𝖗𝖘𝖊
You didn't answer my question, you attempted to force me into an area you thought would I would be weaker in
so let's return to that
What can you use to prove your hypothetical as legitimate?"

First of all, <:ShrekFedora:521390487240966145>
You attempted to deflect it, it's a common fact that nihilists never properly act as nihilists, because they take a different objective and ignore the logical conclusion. I don't need large scale examples, and anyone that reached this conclusion at this point is not likely to be alive <:varg:521372050225627156>
My hypothetical can only be proven by steps of logic, which is what I already showed you. Also there is no reason for a nation to be in this point lol, it's like a facebook social group of socialist antisocials. @The Big Oof

2018-12-10 00:46:51 UTC  

I don't remember deflecting. I've explained my position on absolute morality in the past

2018-12-10 00:46:58 UTC  

not in that particular conversation

2018-12-10 00:47:12 UTC  

it was never really directly challenged, but anyway

2018-12-10 00:47:26 UTC  

And I remember getting the role Fedora Desroyer and your word of defeat <:30yoboomer:521380551316209668>

2018-12-10 00:47:32 UTC  

I made that role

2018-12-10 00:47:35 UTC  

anyway

2018-12-10 00:47:40 UTC  

I've always said we define objective morality subjectively

2018-12-10 00:47:42 UTC  

we do

2018-12-10 00:47:53 UTC  

every two group of people think their system of objective morality is the right one

2018-12-10 00:47:58 UTC  

even I think mine is

2018-12-10 00:48:20 UTC  

this

2018-12-10 00:48:23 UTC  

But I realize at a conscious level it really isn't, because people have different perspectives and hold different accounts of the truth

2018-12-10 00:48:33 UTC  

Truth may be objective

2018-12-10 00:48:36 UTC  

But us being humans

2018-12-10 00:48:44 UTC  

we are limited in our understanding of it

2018-12-10 00:48:48 UTC  

so it's not that I think

2018-12-10 00:48:50 UTC  

context

2018-12-10 00:48:53 UTC  

changes morality

2018-12-10 00:48:59 UTC  

"changes"