Message from @black person
Discord ID: 521487659970068480
Did it happen in the Soviet Union?
Did it happen in China?
Where are all of these people who reject it
Soviet philosophy btw was mad deep and they needed absolutely no god to come up with it
Whether it was right or wrong is not the point
I am bringing up two countries perceived as being atheist
And this occurrence was found in neither
and it should be considered that the Soviet philosophy had ample space for meaning
it was a large focus point
That's really debatable. They said one thing and did something completely different
How they acted was different from their philosophy
no no it was all quite consistent
I've read the Fundamentals for example
and it is a good reflection of what they were going for,
I don't agree
what they were trying to do
well have you read the Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism? 😋
does siege count
Lmao
no XD
"Also, what you just did Bearer was deflect @𝕭𝖊𝖆𝖗𝖊𝖗 𝖔𝖋 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝕮𝖚𝖗𝖘𝖊
You didn't answer my question, you attempted to force me into an area you thought would I would be weaker in
so let's return to that
What can you use to prove your hypothetical as legitimate?"
First of all, <:ShrekFedora:521390487240966145>
You attempted to deflect it, it's a common fact that nihilists never properly act as nihilists, because they take a different objective and ignore the logical conclusion. I don't need large scale examples, and anyone that reached this conclusion at this point is not likely to be alive <:varg:521372050225627156>
My hypothetical can only be proven by steps of logic, which is what I already showed you. Also there is no reason for a nation to be in this point lol, it's like a facebook social group of socialist antisocials. @The Big Oof
I don't remember deflecting. I've explained my position on absolute morality in the past
not in that particular conversation
it was never really directly challenged, but anyway
And I remember getting the role Fedora Desroyer and your word of defeat <:30yoboomer:521380551316209668>
I made that role
anyway
I've always said we define objective morality subjectively
we do
every two group of people think their system of objective morality is the right one
even I think mine is
this
But I realize at a conscious level it really isn't, because people have different perspectives and hold different accounts of the truth
Truth may be objective
But us being humans
we are limited in our understanding of it
so it's not that I think
context
changes morality
"changes"