Message from @εïз irma εïз
Discord ID: 522108934618611722
not market forces
Cool story peterson
*material conditions*
It is an outgrowth of Marxists Thought
entirely different things
>material conditions
material conditions are
a) resources
b) technology level
c) the environment in general, nature factors etc
>not market
these are not "market forces"
basically market
....no
its not market at all
yes
don't fucking deny it
the material world is not "market"
Yeah I agree it isn't very Marxist, I think it's much more Hegelian. But you're shitting yourself if you don't think the original members of the Frankfurt School weren't open Marxists who saw their revisionism as an antidote to both Soviet authoritarianism and democratic socialism.
Like an actual fucktard.
what a bizarre reading
not even ancaps have hot takes like this
ancaps have an universal theory where everything is boiled down to a transaction
Lord make me chaste but not yet.
Stop copying otter you pleb
I am allowed to copy Otter if you're being a fucking knuckledragger.
dude, material conditions refer to the material and technical foundations that men are born into - what technology level a given society has, what chemicals and materials are present in the environment, i.e *the degrees of freedom and limits to development potential inherent in the physical world*
this is not market
ffs
which again is driven by market and economy
Marx was a materialist cuck
😹 when u mental midget
the universe is driven by market?
wew lad
wild
talking about society here bud
stop being mean guys 🤧
Marx spoke about the objective, material world *in general*
Lame, otter always uses the "moo" emoji. Step your game up
his materialism was ontological
play nice
>transaction
Exactly, market exists between individuals. There is no market in material in and of itself